Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Antoine de Favray - Portrait of the Countess of Vergennes in Turkish Attireontes of Vergennes in Turkish Gown - Google Art Project.jpg

====== Voting period ends on 26 Mar 2015  at 06:38:56 (UTC)
 * Reason: Because my plan was to nominate them both. Both the husband and the wife. I was even having coffee with the husband this Saturday, in my private club just to remember to nominate. This is Charles Gravier's wife.
 * Articles in which this image appears:Antoine de Favray, Charles Gravier, comte de Vergennes
 * FP category for this image:Featured pictures/People/Others
 * Creator: Antoine de Favray


 * Support as nominator – Hafspajen (talk) 06:38, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support According to English people WoW! and According to Persian people Bah Bah!__Alborzagros (talk) 07:31, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support A beautiful painting. HullIntegrity  \ talk / 13:10, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - nice image, very good quality.--Godot13 (talk) 03:43, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm torn. There's EV and a gorgeous image, but we don't really have much discussion of his wife. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 10:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Oppose great image, but I don't see the EV since we don't have much info on the painting itself, or the person in the painting. An article on either one would change my mind. Mattximus (talk) 13:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * OH, Herre varför. (Oh, Lord, Why) - OK, write article, BUT it has to be both husband [[File:Antoine de Favray - Portrait of Charles Gravier Count of Vergennes and French Ambassador, in Turkish Attire - Google Art Project.jpg|23px]] and wife. Not that I don't think it doesn't have EV, because it is used in the significant way, but because it would be fun. Portrait of Charles Gravier and Mrs Charles Gravier, maybe? Portrait of Count Charles Gravier and Anette Vivers, Countess Charles Gravier , ... ? Hafspajen (talk) 15:33, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I would be happy with a section on his wife within Charles Gravier, comte de Vergennes's article. I can't find any discussion on his wife, and so this painting, although nice, does not link to any of the content of wikipedia, which is by definition the EV. Mattximus (talk) 13:31, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Well, then I go for that, as a compromise. Was trying to figure out how the heck to do infoboxes with duble portairs, and failed, so far. Hafspajen (talk) 14:55, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Yeah, more than a sentence in the husband's article would help. Essentially, all we're saying is "This is who he married". — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:37, 18 March 2015 (UTC)
 * -, not any more. Hafspajen (talk) 19:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Support - Better, though a bit of repetition in the article now. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 05:51, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Support - SchroCat (talk) 07:04, 19 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Ahem, the husband is two noms down......... Hafspajen (talk) 01:06, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

--Armbrust The Homunculus 07:29, 26 March 2015 (UTC)