Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Historical Panorama of Beirut

Historical panorama of Beirut

 * Reason:This demonstrates an era where panoramic photography debuted, and emphasis on the history of the city.
 * Articles this image appears in:Beirut
 * Creator:Maison Bonfils

--jjron (talk) 06:44, 13 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support as nominator --Banzoo (talk) 23:50, 6 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Neutral for now. This is a tough choice. Such a panoramic image taken during the 1860s is difficult to find, thus the picture's EV is very high. I think that technically the restoration is just not there yet as most parts appear more over-exposed than they should be. Also, perhaps using English titles may be preferable over Arabic to make it identifiable for most people. I'll think about this more. -- mcshadypl T C  07:35, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * As I am not an expert on how to evaluate old photography, I used as a reference for comparison this featured picture (around the same age), yet the resolution is less comparable to this one, and with higher exposure problems (I think). I should note too that after further examination, one may notice the significant time interval between each shot (via shadows), which may explain the difference between exposures of each frame. As of Arabic filename, originally it was meant to be used for Arabic Wikipedia, and commons has no official single language. But after finding the other frames, I thought it would be interesting for other Wikipedias too, while the names remain unchanged, but this is of a minor importance, and not part of the evaluation criteria.--Banzoo (talk) 10:32, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. Very high encyclopedic value. Mostlyharmless (talk) 23:58, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I have to say that i prefer the not for voting version in this case. There is more visible and the rest of my preference is subjective. Noodle snacks (talk) 01:39, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * In fact, I thought about the same thing 5 months ago (with the panorama composed of only 3 frames, if you revise the file history, before getting the hi-res version of the 4th). Anyway, I removed the not for voting label. --Banzoo (talk) 17:40, 8 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Strong support even with the original stain the picture is of great value Eli  +  19:29, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Support. GerardM (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2009 (UTC) Nice to have old images of important cities... it gives historic perspective