Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Steroidogenesis

Steroidogenesis

 * Reason:Large, lots of important information, useful in multiple important articles. The colors make it look less boring than depictions in black-and-white, if not to say even beautiful.
 * Articles this image appears in:


 * Cholesterol
 * Dehydroepiandrosterone
 * Estrogen
 * Progesterone
 * Progestogen
 * Aldosterone
 * Pregnenolone
 * Androstenediol
 * 3-beta-HSD
 * 21-Hydroxylase
 * Steroid metabolism
 * Testosterone
 * Estradiol
 * Androgen
 * Steroid hormone


 * Cortisol
 * Androstenedione
 * Corticosterone
 * Estrone
 * Cytochrome P450
 * Aromatase
 * 17-Hydroxyprogesterone
 * 17-Hydroxypregnenolone
 * Deoxycorticosterone
 * Aldosterone synthase
 * Steroid hydroxylases
 * CYP17A1


 * Cholesterol side-chain cleavage enzyme
 * Steroid 11-beta-hydroxylase
 * Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
 * 17Beta Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase
 * Androstanediol
 * Glucocorticoid remediable aldosteronism


 * Creator:User:Slashme and User:Mikael Häggström


 * Support as nominator --Mikael Häggström (talk) 14:33, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Question Why isn't the svg version nominated? --Muhammad (talk) 15:35, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * MediaWiki renders svg-images imperfectly, requiring them to first be converted to a raster format to avoid ugly flaws. Because this version looks better in Wikipedia, I nominated it. Perhaps both versions should be nominated, but I'm not sure that's allowed. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:50, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I am not sure I am qualified to vote for the image, so I abstain. --Muhammad (talk) 18:01, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose - For now. Being in so many articles it is certainly useful, but I'm not able to assess if it deserves FP status. For example, the meaning of the labels is not clear. In the box, it refers to cellular location, but in the figure it appears to indicate some kind of transformation (green) or enzime (red). The type of the colored areas (some of them with a border line, other without) isn't clear either. Let's wait for further opinions and enlightment -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:46, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Enzymes have both a cellular localization (e.g. mitochindria or endoplasmic reticulum) as well as a function. I'm not sure, however, that it needs to be specifically stated. As to borders, there is no strict border between e.g. glucocorticoids (green area) and mineralocorticoids (purple area), since they partly overlap. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose - on comparison of the two versions I don't see any encyclopaedic inaccuracies in the SVG render, only a couple of sub-10px-difference text aligment issues. When we actually have a very good SVG already uploaded, not having to find someone to create one, I can't support the PNG. If the SVG was nominated, you'd have my support, as all other criteria are completely satisfied. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:10, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I added the svg version. The small changes made to it can be made to the next png-derivative later, when we now there are no more changes to be made for now. Mikael Häggström (talk) 10:00, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Since the addition of the SVG version and a few corrections to it, I change my vote to Support SVG. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 15:45, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support, after the improvements -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:50, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Support as original contributor: I created the black-and-white diagram, and I feel that it's greatly improved by the addition of colour: not only does it make the diagram clearer, but it illustrates the overlap between the functions of the illustrated steroids. I'd also like to note that this is a great example of the multiple-authorship model of Wikipedia! --Slashme (talk) 18:08, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Good point! I made a little gallery on the image page, giving a brief flashback of the evolution of the image. Mikael Häggström (talk) 20:13, 30 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Support. Very nice and hugely useful.  Another good svg.  |→ Spaully₪† 23:57, 31 March 2009 (GMT)
 * Nice. I suggest to rotate the enzyme names 180 degrees so they read in the same orientation as the "Androgens (19 corbons)" and "Estrogens (21 carbons)" labels at the left. Less strain people's necks :-) . --İnfoCan (talk) 13:58, 2 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for noticing it! I corrected it, but I found it was better to turn the "Androgens" and "Estrogens" instead, avoiding having to read from bottom to top. Mikael Häggström (talk) 15:55, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

MER-C 07:53, 7 April 2009 (UTC)