Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/White's tree frog

White's tree frog


I found out that my last photo for White's tree frog was up for Featured Picture candidacy after it had been disapproved. I didn't particularly like the image (for technical reasons, the frog is beautiful), but most of the opposition was for image size, of which I have updated since. Someone should have told me it was up. I have been trying to get an improved image for ages, and then I found this one that lives on/near my house. This was the best photo I took. Appears in White's tree frog, and taken by liquidGhoul 06:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC).


 * Nominate and support. - liquidGhoul 06:02, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support. Looks great! &mdash; 0918 BRIAN &bull; 2006-01-2 06:32
 * Support, good use of surroundings. - Mgm|(talk) 10:57, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support, looks good and has relevance to its article. -- ʀ6ʍ ɑ  ʏ89  16:55, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Flcelloguy (A note? ) 02:15, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Yay!! We've had a couple of frogs turned down recently and I've been hoping a really exceptional one would come along. ~ Veledan • Talk 18:48, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - Nice work. --Kilo-Lima 20:04, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Very nice picture. Colors are especially nice. --Ironchef8000 21:13, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Nice work --Fir0002 06:15, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - Looks a lot better than the last one of this frog i nominated. -- ZeWrestler  Talk 00:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support - Very nice photo. The frog is nicely framed, while still looking natural. JQF 21:38, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Edit - That's much better! Doesn't make me fell nose to nose with the frog. JQF 21:40, 9 January 2006 (UTC)


 * ooo! that is an exceptional picture. drumguy 8800  - speak? 06:41, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Neutral . Nice and clear, but it's a little too tightly cropped for my liking. enochlau (talk) 11:20, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I can easily fix that. I will now. --liquidGhoul 11:23, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Done --liquidGhoul 12:33, 6 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support new version. enochlau (talk) 12:50, 6 January 2006 (UTC)


 * Support the edit. Renata3 05:29, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support the new version, yup Sherurcij (talk) (Terrorist Wikiproject) 23:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support Edited better  D a Gizza Chat  (c) 04:32, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support second, much better! --Dschwen 07:29, 12 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support either version Eyesclosed 20:15, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
 * Support second Julien 00:19, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

Raven4x4x 04:43, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

