Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Mario Kart: Double Dash/1

Mario Kart: Double Dash
On 5 March, tagged this 2012 GA as needing cleanup, noting on the talk page that the article was "well below GA standards" and contained "unsourced content, trivia, sloppy stuff, etc." &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 14:17, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * • [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Good_article_reassessment/Mario_Kart:_Double_Dash/1&action=watch Watch article reassessment page] • Most recent review
 * Result: Delisted. &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2024 (UTC)


 * Yes, it's in terrible shape - a victim of a decade plus of people slow degrading it into a worse status. I originally intended on cleaning it up myself, but I've lost interest and am focusing on other projects now, so that cleanup effort probably won't come from me anymore... Sergecross73   msg me  14:26, 10 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Roll back Why not just roll back the article to the last "GA-quality" version? It was fully-sourced at one point before a lot of cruft was added. The only part relevant to the modern day is a Kotaku listicle. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 15:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm open to that if someone wants to present a certain version to revert back to. Not much has happened with this game over the years - it hasn't been re-released, found a cult following, had much in the way of a retrospective commentary, etc. So there's probably not much concern about it being "outdated" if we were to do that. Sergecross73   msg me  15:35, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * The article was listed as a GA on 2 May 2012, and the adding of unsourced content began less than ten days afterwards. If rollback is needed, it would have to be to the version promoted to GA, which does not satisfy the current criteria (criterion 2b), for example). &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 16:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Yeah, fair, even the GA version is a bit light on sourcing. (Sorry Salv.) Sergecross73   msg me  23:39, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Went ahead and fixed the gameplay section on a whim, so there's that chunk of work done. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 21:54, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 * do you think the fix is good enough to keep the GA status? &#126;~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
 * I wouldn't say so personally. The reception section is still lacking even with the one paragraph I added to it, and I've been too lazy lately to fix it further. Cat&#39;s Tuxedo (talk) 17:45, 8 June 2024 (UTC)