Wikipedia:Peer review/Bong/archive1

Bong
I would like to see this as a featured article. I am curious what other people think about the article as a whole. Please leave any comments for how you think it could be improved. Triddle 20:39, Jun 23, 2005 (UTC)


 * The article could benefit from a history (or development) section, it doesn't say when, where, or who created the bong. In addition, inline citations are recommended. Finally, the lead section is a bit short- maybe another paragraph? Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk 22:29, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * A Bong is also colloquial for a Bengali, a resident of Bengal. =Nichalp   «Talk»=  18:22, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)


 * The first picture is beautiful, but I think is a little confusing for the unitiated. Maybe the lead picture should be a simple, achetypal bong.  You should definently keep the current picture though, because it is really nice.  Maybe further down to illustrate bongs as a form of art. ike9898 June 28, 2005 21:23 (UTC)
 * Considering there's only one in-line link in the whole article it almost doesn't seem worth it, but if you want this to be featured it has to employ the and  system. Thanks. Harro5 July 8, 2005 23:16 (UTC)


 * Don't quite understand what the serial numbers are. Deryck C. 14:32, 21 July 2005 (UTC)