Wikipedia:Peer review/Georgi Kinkladze/archive3

Georgi Kinkladze
This peer review discussion has been closed. This article recently failed a featured nomination, so I am looking for feedback on what else is needed to reach featured standard. Oldelpaso (talk) 13:45, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Previous peer review

Everything else from myself has previously been addressed. Peanut4 (talk) 14:09, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Comments from
 * I'd move ref 3 to after Gio, since I presume it refers to just Gio, not Gio and Kinky.
 * I'm pretty sure there's something somewhere in the MoS which specifies placing refs after punctuation.
 * I was under the impression that implies after rather than before punctuation where it exists. If that reference is just for Gio, then I'd put it straight after Gio. Peanut4 (talk) 14:48, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
 * I'd add some wikilinks to "When Georgian football formed leagues independent of Soviet competition in 1989". There a few alternatives at Association football around the world.
 * Our articles about Georgian football are sketchy at best, but I've put in a link to Football in Georgia.
 * I know you've linked midfielder and playmaker quite high, but I'd be tempted to repeat those wikilinks in the "Style of play" section.
 * Done.
 * Maybe add new columns for the references in the statistics section.
 * Done. Oldelpaso (talk) 14:40, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

To start, I offer you an apology for my bad timing. I went to take another look for problems just after the FAC was archived. Picking up from where I left off...
 * Anorthosis: "on the day of second leg of the tie against Rangers" Incorrect grammar.
 * Rubin Kazan: Don't need the club name linked here, since it is in the previous section.
 * "his corner kick was headed into the net by a team-mate" Which team-mate?
 * Don't like "in three more minutes".
 * "mistake in is choice of penalty taker" Typo.
 * Berdyev doesn't need a link here.
 * Current ref 106 not after punctuation.
 * 2006 season: Rostov doesn't need another link. Giants2008 (talk) 02:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
 * No worries. All the above points done. Oldelpaso (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


 * A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style. If you would find such a review helpful, please click here. Thanks, APR t 02:53, 26 May 2008 (UTC)