Wikipedia:Peer review/Myocardial infarction/archive1

Myocardial infarction
I nominated this article for featured article status and peer review because of the exemplary contributions of the community medical editors and contributers in making this a premier medical source. The amount of information and organization is top notch. This is an excellent opportunity to show off our skilled health science pages. Before this article is ready for FA status I believe it might need some more skilled editing and refining. I will continue to work on this page myself but please make any contributions you can! I think the treatment and first aid sections need work. While this article has many good sources, sometimes they are not cited in the text as footnotes. Thank you! Scope2776 04:19, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Particularly useful peer review input would be the idea of non-medical specialists on the prose, specific sections that are too full with medicle mambo-jambo...--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:39, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Yeah, some section have areas that are a bit loaded for the reader: Overall pretty good; the style, formating and references are fine.  Voice -of- All  18:30, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Risk factors
 * Histopathology

Instructions here at WP:PR say that articles which have been submitted to FAC should be removed from here: can you please archive this peer review? Thanks, Sandy Georgia (Talk) 20:49, 9 March 2007 (UTC)