Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 April 7



Template:Maidstone United F.C.

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:27, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Per WP:NAVBOX, there are not enough useful links to justify a navbox. History, First team squad and Club staff and officials all link to sections in the (already linked) main club article. Ashford Town is a club that they groundshare with and thus not really part of the topic. That just leaves the main article, the former club and a proposed future stadium, so a navbox is not needed. Jameboy (talk) 18:37, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Jameboy (talk) 20:40, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. – PeeJay 13:32, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom; navbox not needed. Airplaneman   ✈  18:34, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Agraceful

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 16:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Unused Navbox with just redlinks in content area. WOSlinker (talk) 17:56, 7 April 2010 (UTC) Author delete band page was deleted, no purpose for this template anymore. -- ҚЯĀŽΨÇÉV  13  20:01, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per author request above. Airplaneman   ✈  18:36, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Neath Port Talbot

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. Template now used. WOSlinker (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Unused Navbox Template without any links. WOSlinker (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I will finish this template and post on the corresponding pages by the end of the week. ~ Geaugagrrl talk 06:18, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Now populated and distributed, using the same layout as previous Welsh counties. ~ Geaugagrrl talk 21:11, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep now that's it's populated and used -- WOSlinker (talk) 21:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Bridgend

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Keep. Nomination withdrawn. Template now used.

Unused Navbox Template without any links. WOSlinker (talk) 17:48, 7 April 2010 (UTC)


 * I will finish this template and post on the corresponding pages by the end of the week. ~ Geaugagrrl talk 06:17, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Now populated and distributed, using the same layout as previous Welsh counties. FruitMonkey (talk) 18:03, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep now that's it's populated and used -- WOSlinker (talk) 18:11, 9 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Censor!

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 00:30, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

Unused spoiler style Template. WOSlinker (talk) 17:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - orphaned and also per WP:SW. Airplaneman   ✈  18:38, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Peter Mandelson

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 02:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)

Half the links in the template appear in some form in the article, and another 2 link to the same article. ShawnIsHere (talk) 00:24, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, template city, little or no value, I just removed Mandelsonian politics ? what is that a new word? and Mo the movie which is also not closely related to Mandelson or perhaps not related at all. Off2riorob (talk) 00:47, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete: I'm usually pro template, but the number of new ones for cabinet members are just absurd.--&#91;&#91;User: Duffy2032&#124;Duffy2032&#93;&#93; (talk) 02:38, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete, Serves no useful purpose and will simply lead to proliferation. Leaky  Caldron  13:17, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per all of the above. Not needed. Airplaneman   ✈  18:54, 11 April 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.