Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 April 20



Template:A-Class-GA

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Procedural close, already deleted by. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:59, 28 April 2019 (UTC) A subst-only template to begin an A-class assessment process for a WikiProject currently marked as inactive.
 * A-Class-GA

Furthermore, even if the WikiProject were active, the template also uses the term 'GA' in its name, a common acronym for good articles. This is confusing and led to it erroneously being categorized with Category:Wikipedia GA templates. eπi ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 22:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:EdenCharacter

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:47, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Unused character template (not quite sure if fictional or just Garden of Eden related), which was created in 2016 and only edited in the first 24 hours of creation. There are other infoboxes that are used either for fictional characters or real people. Gonnym (talk) 22:14, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * EdenCharacter
 * Delete as unnecessary because other infoboxes are available and used instead. To comment on its purpose, it's Christianity-related, and was created by a sockpuppet of a user blocked for edit warring on Christianity-related pages. Note also that the similarly named template by the same user was deleted two years earlier.  eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 00:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as redundant. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:40, 26 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1924

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1929 to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 10:26, 13 April 2019 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Aviation accidents and incidents in 1924
 * Merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:aviation accidents and incidents in 1929, inclusive, to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s or something like that.   This and two other aviation accident year navboxes have been nominated for deletion (on different days) with the rationale that there aren't enough entries, apparently without considering the obvious solution of merging a decade of templates into one.  There aren't many Wikipedia articles about notable aviation accidents in the 1920s, yet, but there are plenty as you progress through the later years of the navbox series. RecycledPixels (talk) 14:45, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:10, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per Recycled. --Izno (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1925

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1929 to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 00:55, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Navbox with just one link. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 15:05, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Aviation accidents and incidents in 1925

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete if this was not being discussed I would have removed the one link as it doesnt point to an accident article. MilborneOne (talk) 08:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Even if it did have an independent article, one article is not sufficient for a NAVBOX. The primary task for a NAVBOX is for navigating between similar articles not lists. NAVBOX with two or less links get deleted around here routinely. I know, I have started many such TFDs....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 12:38, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Comment Thks William understood. MilborneOne (talk) 14:34, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in 1920 through Template:aviation accidents and incidents in 1929, inclusive, to Template:Aviation accidents and incidents in the 1920s or something like that.   This and two other aviation accident year navboxes have been nominated for deletion (on different days) with the rationale that there aren't enough entries, apparently without considering the obvious solution of merging a decade of templates into one.  There aren't many Wikipedia articles about notable aviation accidents in the 1920s, yet, but there are plenty as you progress through the later years of the navbox series. RecycledPixels (talk) 19:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per above. --Gonnym (talk) 15:14, 17 April 2019 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 20:09, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Merge per Recycled. --Izno (talk) 14:17, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Grand Trunk Western s-line templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete - F ASTILY   00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC) Superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Grand Trunk Western Railroad. All transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 17:49, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * GT color
 * GT lines
 * GT stations
 * S-line/GT left/Cincinnati, Saginaw and Mackinaw Division
 * S-line/GT left/Detroit - Port Huron
 * S-line/GT left/Detroit and Milwaukee Division
 * S-line/GT left/Detroit – Port Huron
 * S-line/GT left/main
 * S-line/GT right/Detroit - Port Huron
 * S-line/GT right/Detroit and Milwaukee Division
 * S-line/GT right/Detroit – Port Huron
 * S-line/GT right/main
 * Delete: The last 9 are just data storage, with one city name each. The first one is also data storage, with only 000000. I will caveat by saying I haven't coded any LUA modules, but using a LUA dictionary for data storage seems like a more sustainable solution than a dozen disparate pages.  eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 12:40, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

NYSW s-line templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete - F ASTILY   00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC) S-line templates for the New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad; superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/New York, Susquehanna and Western Railroad and Module:Adjacent stations/Erie Railroad. Mackensen (talk) 17:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * NYSW color
 * NYSW lines
 * NYSW stations
 * S-line/NYSW left/Main Line
 * S-line/NYSW right/Main Line
 * Delete per nom. See also my comments on the other two adjacent nominations: 1, 2. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 13:26, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Erie Railroad s-line templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete - F ASTILY   00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC) S-line templates for the Erie Railroad; superseded by Module:Adjacent stations/Erie Railroad. All article space transclusions replaced. Mackensen (talk) 17:07, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Erie stations
 * Erie color
 * Erie lines
 * Erie style
 * S-line/Erie left/Bradford
 * S-line/Erie left/Cleveland-Youngstown
 * S-line/Erie left/Cleveland–Youngstown
 * S-line/Erie left/Main Line-New York
 * S-line/Erie left/allegany
 * S-line/Erie left/attica
 * S-line/Erie left/b&sw
 * S-line/Erie left/bergen
 * S-line/Erie left/bradford
 * S-line/Erie left/buffalo
 * S-line/Erie left/caldwell
 * S-line/Erie left/cleveland
 * S-line/Erie left/ferry
 * S-line/Erie left/jefferson
 * S-line/Erie left/mahoning
 * S-line/Erie left/main
 * S-line/Erie left/middletown
 * S-line/Erie left/mountmorris
 * S-line/Erie left/newark
 * S-line/Erie left/newcity
 * S-line/Erie left/njny
 * S-line/Erie left/northern
 * S-line/Erie left/nygl
 * S-line/Erie left/nysw
 * S-line/Erie left/orange
 * S-line/Erie left/piermont
 * S-line/Erie left/ringwood
 * S-line/Erie left/rochbranch
 * S-line/Erie left/rochester
 * S-line/Erie left/weehawken
 * S-line/Erie left/wyoming
 * S-line/Erie right/Bradford
 * S-line/Erie right/Cleveland-Youngstown
 * S-line/Erie right/Cleveland–Youngstown
 * S-line/Erie right/Main Line-New York
 * S-line/Erie right/allegany
 * S-line/Erie right/attica
 * S-line/Erie right/b&sw
 * S-line/Erie right/bergen
 * S-line/Erie right/bradford
 * S-line/Erie right/buffalo
 * S-line/Erie right/caldwell
 * S-line/Erie right/cleveland
 * S-line/Erie right/ferry
 * S-line/Erie right/ferry 23rd
 * S-line/Erie right/graham
 * S-line/Erie right/jefferson
 * S-line/Erie right/mahoning
 * S-line/Erie right/main
 * S-line/Erie right/middletown
 * S-line/Erie right/mountmorris
 * S-line/Erie right/newark
 * S-line/Erie right/newcity
 * S-line/Erie right/njny
 * S-line/Erie right/northern
 * S-line/Erie right/nygl
 * S-line/Erie right/nysw
 * S-line/Erie right/orange
 * S-line/Erie right/piermont
 * S-line/Erie right/ringwood
 * S-line/Erie right/rochbranch
 * S-line/Erie right/rochester
 * S-line/Erie right/weehawken
 * S-line/Erie right/wyoming
 * Delete. Phew! That was quite a few templates to review. Just like your other nomination, the vast majority of these are city name data storage, with only Erie stations, Erie color, Erie lines, Erie style, and S-line/Erie right/nysw being more template-like. Once again, a LUA dictionary seems better than dozens of disparate pages (with the same caveat that I haven't coded any LUA modules.)
 * I will also note as a matter of process that you should remove 8 of the pages from this nomination because they're redirects (see What not to propose for discussion here):, , , , , , , . It's also a waste of time to list them at RfD, because they can be deleted under G8 after the templates they redirect to are deleted. eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 13:19, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Several merged tables (3)

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete - F ASTILY   00:26, 28 April 2019 (UTC) no longer needed after being merged (with attribution) with 2014–15 NIFL Premiership, 2008–09 Iran Pro League, 2009–10 Iran Pro League, ... Frietjes (talk) 13:26, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 2014–15 NIFL Premiership table
 * 2009–10 Iran Pro League table
 * 2008–09 Iran Pro League table
 * 2011 Malaysia Super League table
 * 2007 AFC Asian Cup group tables
 * 2011 AFC Asian Cup group tables
 * 2015 AFC Asian Cup group tables
 * 2010 Primera División Peruana season table
 * , Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup group tables was previously merged from Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group A table, Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group B table, Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group C table and Template:2015 AFC Asian Cup Group D table. Did you also leave attribution for those templates? Hhkohh (talk) 10:54, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Hhkohh, yes, now added. Frietjes (talk) 13:43, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. GiantSnowman 08:37, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2019/20 National League south table

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 28 April 2019 (UTC) unused Frietjes (talk) 13:24, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 2019/20 National League south table
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 08:34, 23 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 08:38, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:2018 Road to the final1

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:09, 21 April 2019 (UTC) unused Frietjes (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * 2018 Road to the final1

Yes I created this template few months ago, but unused, without any further discussion I want to be Delete this template , thanks(Mr.Mani Raj Paul (talk) 14:04, 20 April 2019 (UTC))
 * Based on your above comment, I've tagged it with db-g7. You can also tag pages where you're the only substantial contributor yourself using that template (see WP:G7). eπi  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 00:52, 21 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Kilkenny

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. —&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·C) 01:56, 27 April 2019 (UTC) WikiProject Kilkenny was userfied in April 2011 to User:Mrchris/WikiProject Kilkenny per this MFD which I started, and the title was redirected to WP:WikiProject Ireland. I dunno how the banner survived so long after the project was terminated, but it is absurd to have a project banner and associated category structure (see Category:WikiProject Kilkenny articles plus subcats) for a non-project.
 * WikiProject Kilkenny

NB Please do NOT redirect this banner to Template:WikiProject Ireland. The importance rating assigned in a Kilkenny-only context will be very differnet to those assigned in an all-Ireland context. -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 01:21, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * PS I have checked that all the non-userspace pages tagged with this project banner are tagged with . -- Brown HairedGirl  (talk) • (contribs) 01:57, 20 April 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete along with the categories, probably qualifies as a db-subpage. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 14:45, 20 April 2019 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Design-EU

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 May 15. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:49, 15 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Design-EU
 * Intellectual_property_laws_of_the_European_Union
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).