Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 13



Template:Ifexist subpage

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused template. Gonnym (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Ifexist subpage
 * Comment the template name doesn't make sense, If kept this needs to be renamed. Suggest Ifexist subpage then transclude -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:02, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Portal related. 10 years old and seemingly still unused. Nigej (talk) 08:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Chadic languages

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:35, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. Superseded by Afroasiatic languages, which contains all of these navboxes and a few more. – Jonesey95 (talk) 16:09, 6 January 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Chadic languages
 * I've added the template to Chadic languages, though I don't think it makes sense to use it on any other articles. Afroasiatic languages in its current form is a monstrosity that should only be used on Afroasiatic languages. – Uanfala (talk) 16:36, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment - Can't we just add Chadic languages to Afroasiatic languages instead of the 4 templates there relating to Chadic languages and then we wouldn't have the current undesirable duplication and Afroasiatic languages wouldn't be such a monstrosity either. Nigej (talk) 16:58, 6 January 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as a pointless wrapper. If the intention is to only have those 4 navboxes on Chadic languages, then use those 4 templates. We don't need a template that holds those templates for that. Gonnym (talk) 23:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per Gonnym. In fact a wrapper for navboxes is nearly always counterproductive. Having to open a wrapper before opening a second template is all going to discourage users from using these for their actual purpose, navigation. Nigej (talk) 06:36, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PartofWPIran

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions, no incoming links. If we ever tagged WikiProject pages in this non-obvious way, we no longer do so; categories work just fine. See previous TFD (December 2020) about a similar template. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * PartofWPIran
 * PartofWPMAURITIUS
 * Comment: Also note that there are at least a dozen or so similar templates that have a few transclusions but that are probably similarly inappropriate. Since they are transcluded, they should not be added to this nomination, but a separate nomination would be fine. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I've never noticed these but these are really bad. Template:PartofWPLDS for example is used directly on articles. Gonnym (talk) 22:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment The solution obtained from the TfD for "PartofWPPUNJAB" was to move it into projectspace as a subpage. This could be carried out for all of these that were discovered. WikiProject Punjab/PartofWPPUNJAB (2017 TfD) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:19, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment These are all formatted the same way. A MetaTemplate should be built, instead of each of these coding their own divs. That would standardize the look and the templates could all then be traced back to the metatemplate. These all look akin to topicon ; perhaps that could be used as a solution to standardizing these. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:30, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete. We have WikiProject banners that go on talk pages. There is no reason for another tag on the non-talk page. Gonnym (talk) 22:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Comment looks like PartofWPIran was replaced by PartofWPIran2 -- therefore REDIRECT PartofWPIran to PartofWPIran2 -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:24, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete All completely unnecessary. eg WikiProject Iran/Open Tasks (tagged with PartofWPIran2) doesn't need to be so tagged, its clearly part of the project from its name and the banner on the talk page. So the template simply provides a clickable flag which takes you to the project page. If the article is in the right place (as here) it's very easy to get there anyway and if it's not, it needs moving. Worse, some of these "PartofWP..." templates are now in user talk pages. Nigej (talk) 08:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parties-content

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork ―Œ (talk) 22:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions, incoming links, documentation, or categories. The only substantive edits were creation in 2005. This may have been used at one time, but its utility appears to have diminished to zero. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Parties-content
 * Delete per nom. Also article text that shouldn't be stored in a template. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment it looks like boilerplate text for list articles -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 06:53, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Participating nations

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  10:10, 14 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. Empty template created by, who knows which way is up but who appears to have abandoned this idea after creating this placeholder. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Participating nations
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Userfy to user:Primefac/sandbox/Template:Participating nations to let Primefac sort this undeveloped empty template out. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:40, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. The creator can surely make his own copy. Nigej (talk) 06:39, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Participant editor and sibling templates

 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:20, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions except on one user page. These are all except one of the templates in ; they appear to be an abandoned experiment. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Participant editor
 * Program instructor
 * Start of program timeline
 * Start of program week
 * End of program week
 * Delete all per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parks and commons of Bury
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. Sidebar with no main article and only four linked articles. is probably sufficient to link these articles together. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Parks and commons of Bury
 * Delete Used to be a few articles (4, I suspect) after creation in 2008 but has since been removed from them all. Fails much of what makes a good sidebar, in particular, there's no parent article. Nigej (talk) 22:02, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Parameter footer
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:18, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. Only substantive edits were creation in 2007. Template:Parameter footer: searching for the name of this template in template space turns up nothing, so it does not appear to be called by any other templates. The same is true of Template:parameter header – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Parameter footer
 * Parameter header
 * Delete both per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment a rough doc added -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment it looks like it was supposed to be used as template documentation to standardized soccer template parameter tables -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:56, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Perhaps some plan to standardise documentation of the fb templates, but seemingly never used. Nigej (talk) 08:20, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. GiantSnowman 11:47, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - not needed. GiantSnowman 11:48, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Enlargeddanishmunic
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  23:49, 20 January 2022 (UTC) This is banner cruft from 15 years ago. Recommend total deletion. Izno (talk) 21:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Enlargeddanishmunic
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Peer review transclusion
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Never caught on. Would favor removal of the table elements and subsequent subst/deletion. Izno (talk) 21:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Peer review transclusion
 * Delete without substing as redundant to Template:Old peer review. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Pakistan nuke plant map
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions or incoming links. Nuclear power in Pakistan uses a straightforward location map, so a single-use template page is probably not needed. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Pakistan nuke plant map
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Uvs Nuur discussion
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:11, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Notification template from 14 years ago that would normally be in plain text these days. Izno (talk) 21:22, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Uvs Nuur discussion
 * Delete per nom. Highly specific template created 14 years ago and left unused waiting to be deleted. Nigej (talk) 21:28, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Subst and delete. No longer useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Polyglot RFD
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:08, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Basically unused after 15 years. Izno (talk) 21:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Polyglot RFD
 * Delete A template to notify readers of an article that another language Wikipedia is considering deleting its version of the article. Looks like it was used once, in 2007. Nigej (talk) 21:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment if kept, it should be converted to a notice boilerplate text subst-only template, like other deletion notification templates (ie. TFDnote ) -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 04:13, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lambda Sigma Upsilon articles
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Used on two articles (one after I remove it in a moment), with a half-dozen links to the main page and little else. Basically, there isn't enough here to merit a sidebar. Primefac (talk) 19:57, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Lambda Sigma Upsilon articles
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Basically there's only two articles: Lambda Sigma Upsilon and List of Lambda Sigma Upsilon chapters and there's plenty of links to jump between those two. Others at Category:Fraternity and sorority sidebar templates can doubtless go too. Nigej (talk) 20:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Article and date
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused but also it's more simple to just use a pipe and a label. The 3rd example is just a complete MOS:EGG. Gonnym (talk) 19:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Article and date
 * Delete Can't see the point. MOS:NOTOOLTIPS severely limits its useability anyway. Nigej (talk) 20:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Country data South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Used on the wrong pages and this is not a country but an international political organization. Has no real chance of usage. The user who created this has been doing disruptive editing and two of his alt accounts have been blocked permanently. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 19:20, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Country data South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * @Pppery @WikiCleanerMan Please, don't. As I have a reason. It is because several just like Template:Country data Collective Security Treaty Organization and NATO, it is just another political organisation. And it is not even used in the wrong pages: Foreign relations of India. And i can give multiple examples. please consider them as well. Utkarsh555 (talk) 15:37, 18 January 2022 (UTC)
 * delete, unused. Frietjes (talk) 18:16, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Modern portal
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 18:38, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Listed as under construction since it was restored in 2018. After asking at WikiProject Portals, it seems this was never used. Gonnym (talk) 18:15, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Modern portal
 * Delete per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete Unused and unneeded template. Cactus.man   &#9997;  01:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Purge link portals2
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Used in one portal but does the same exact thing as Template:Purge link portals just resizing it a little. I don't think that the resize is helpful, but even if it were, a resize parameter could have been added. No need for another template. To be clear though, I propose a replacement and deletion, not a merge, as 489 portals work fine with the standard size compared to this one usage. Gonnym (talk) 17:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Purge link portals2
 * Replace/delete per nom. Surely we want a common style. I'd be against a resize parameter. Nigej (talk) 18:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ten portals links
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork <sub style="font-size: 60%">―Œ <sup style="margin-left:-3ex">(talk) 22:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused in actual portals and only used in two archived talk pages. Should be subst there and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 17:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Ten portals links
 * Subst/Delete Part of a proposal from 2005 to add this template to every page: Village_pump_(proposals)/Archive_I. Seems it was originally called "Eight portals links" then "Ten portals links" and now has nine portals. Clearly the links to Eight portals links need sorting out too before that is deleted too. Nigej (talk) 18:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete without the subst. It's uncommon to subst solely for the use of archives. --Izno (talk) 17:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:PBIE
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Now unused after I replaced the single use at Template:User Republic of Ireland/cat with. Gonnym (talk) 16:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * PBIE
 * Delete per nom. Just provided a different flag in a link to a portal. Nigej (talk) 18:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Portal-image
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:33, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused portal templates. Gonnym (talk) 16:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Portal-image
 * Portals tree
 * Index-Project
 * Related portals 2
 * Related portal item small
 * Selected topic
 * Subportals
 * Comment Box portal skeleton is subst-only, so it's hard to tell when it was last used or if it will be used again. -- John of Reading (talk) 17:16, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out, I missed that. Removing it from the list. --Gonnym (talk) 17:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete all per nom. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete allto lack of use.Guilherme Burn (talk) 17:13, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:NCAA Division I men's lacrosse independents navbox
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:30, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. None of these teams are independent today, so there is no possible use for this navbox at this time. Most have joined the ASUN Conference. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:38, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * NCAA Division I men's lacrosse independents navbox
 * Delete per nom. Ceased to have a useful purpose. Clearly intended to be a current list. Nigej (talk) 15:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Myanmar 1980s estab by year
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. Replaced by  in. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Myanmar 1980s estab by year
 * Delete per nom. Superseded by the generic template noted. Nigej (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above claims are inaccurate. This template was never used on the 1980s decade category, but on year categories within that range, namely Category:1980 establishments in Burma to 1988. It has not been superseded by a generic template. Rather, as part of the roll-out of navseasoncats two years ago, user:BrownHairedGirl replaced it with nine lines of tailored code. I suggest that it would be better to insert more instances of resolve category redirect within EstcatCountry, for the parent categories that are generated by that template, and then replace the nine lines of code with that. Once that has been done, a few more category redirects between old and new country names in anachronistic years & decades will make EstcatCountry suitable to replace the nominated template's siblings: Namibia 1910s estab by year, Thailand 1930s estab by year, and perhaps Russia 1910s estab by year – which is a little different as it has separate lines for Russian Empire and Russia. – Fayenatic  L ondon 20:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. However eg Category:1982 establishments in Burma seems to work ok without it. We don't have a Myanmar 1970s estab by year but Category:1972 establishments in Burma also seems to work well, so I still don't see the point of retaining the highly specific template we're discussing. Nigej (talk) 20:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * , thanks for that explanation. Is this template still useful in some way? It sounds like it has been superseded by 's useful code updates. – Jonesey95 (talk) 21:41, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * No, this can go. Its purpose was to bridge the change of name in categories from Burma to Myanmar in 1989 – that's why there was no need for e.g. a 1970s template. It is now no longer needed since Tom.Reding put the "resolve category redirect" functionality into Navseasoncats. As for sibling templates, there are also Russia 1720s estab by year, Russia 1720s disestab by year and Russia 1910s disestab by year. – Fayenatic  L ondon 08:11, 14 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Fix EstcatCountry and use it per Fayenatic. Fix EstcatCountry either by using Resolve category redirect or by placing a specific Burma check for years 1980-1988. In categories it is better to use one of the category templates than use manual categories as changes to the template will be missed by those not using it. Gonnym (talk) 21:47, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete as unused. The rest of this discussion belongs elsewhere since nobody is arguing for returning this template to use. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Multiple place names
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:37, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. Was once used at Multiple-place names, which is now an empty historical page. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:30, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Multiple place names
 * Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 15:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:MormonCollaboration
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions, documentation, or incoming links. May have been used at one point, but no longer appears to be useful. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * MormonCollaboration
 * Delete Sort of voting system to decide the next Mormon collaboration. Relates to WP:MormonC, inactive since 2007. See Mormon collaboration/History. Nigej (talk) 14:54, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment doc added -- this is clearly a substitution template, so there should be no transclusions -- this is used by Mormon collaboration and is directly documented at that page. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Rename to Wikipedia:Mormon collaboration/Template:MormonCollaboration as this doesn't need to sit in template space, it can work just fine a subpage, since this is a skeleton substed onto the nonimation subpage. The instructions should be updated on the main page to reflect this new location -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 17:33, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Possible Mormon COTM should also be moved to Wikipedia:Mormon collaboration/Template:Possible Mormon COTM, and the instructions updated on the main page to reflect this change. -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 18:04, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Mormon COTM was deleted in 2017. see Templates for discussion/Log/2017 October 13. There was also the short-lived Latter Day Saint Collaboration of the fortnight which also has a number of utterly useless templates lying around: LDSCOTF, CurrentLDSCOTF, etc. Nigej (talk) 18:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete This template has not served a useful purpose in over a decade; there is no value to moving (rather than deleting) it or its brethren. * Pppery * <sub style="color:#800000">it has begun... 23:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Anjou
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  14:34, 20 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Anjou
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Lachine
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/LaSalle
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Le Plateau-Mont-Royal
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Montréal-Nord
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Outremont
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Rivière-des-Prairies–Pointe-aux-Trembles
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Rosemont–La Petite-Patrie
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Saint-Laurent
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Saint-Léonard
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Verdun
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Ville-Marie
 * Montreal municipal election, 2021/Borough results/Villeray–Saint-Michel–Parc-Extension

No transclusions. Empty data cells. These templates appear to have been designed for single-article use at 2021 Montreal municipal election, but there are already tables in that article. Delete, or userfy if the creator would like to keep the image cells and add them to the article. – Jonesey95 (talk) 14:14, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:27, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. And as they said, even if it were used, it would still be single used template which would be much better in the article itself. Gonnym (talk) 16:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. and personally I prefer the style that is currently used. Nigej (talk) 17:43, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Hitastigar
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:47, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Created in 2015 and unused other than in the creator's sandbox. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 11:00, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Hitastigar
 * Delete as unused duplicate of Timeline Temperature Conversion. Probably copied from a different-language wikipedia. Nigej (talk) 12:23, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete breach of copyright for a copy and paste duplicate. <span style="white-space:nowrap;text-shadow:#009200 0.3em 0.4em 1.0em,#009200 -0.2em -0.2em 1.0em;color:#009200">Noah Talk 11:16, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of English monarchs
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:48, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused other than in a user's page which hasn't been edited since 2012. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 10:59, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Timeline of English monarchs
 * Delete as unused. We've drifted away from this style of timeline. Just looks a mess. Can't see us going back to them. Nigej (talk) 12:01, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cost of energy sources
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:52, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused in mainspace and only used in two archived talk pages. Subst there and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 10:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Cost of energy sources
 * I was proud of this at the time, but it seems nobody updated it and it was removed in 2014 by Johnfos. As you say, it should be preserved in discussion of its removal started by J. D. Redding, and the reference debate on modifying it (otherwise the discussion is rootless - notwithstanding it seems to have been started by a sockpuppeter...), but if not actively used there is no need to keep it as a template. GreenReaper (talk) 12:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Subst/Delete per nom. Can't see a need for it, even if it was updated. Nigej (talk) 12:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline Australian PM
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:53, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused other than in a talk page. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Timeline Australian PM
 * Delete As with so many of these timelines, they date back to the early days when such things were quite common. Won't get used again IMO. Nigej (talk) 12:05, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:1973 Atlantic hurricane season timeline
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  12:55, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused other than in an abandoned user's page which hasn't been edited by them since 2009. Subst there and delete. Gonnym (talk) 10:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * 1973 Atlantic hurricane season timeline
 * Subst/Delete per nom. Seems to be a one-off, no other years. Nigej (talk) 12:58, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Timeline of Bose 2.1 systems
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  13:01, 20 January 2022 (UTC) The above are all unused Bose related timeline templates that were created over 11 years ago. The pages that I found that could theoretically host these are Bose headphones, Bose shelf stereos, and List of Bose home audio products, however if after 11 years these aren't used then these are probably not wanted and I won't be adding them. Gonnym (talk) 10:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Timeline of Bose 2.1 systems
 * Timeline of Bose 5.1 systems
 * Timeline of Bose Soundbar and TV systems
 * Timeline of Bose headphones
 * Timeline of Bose surround sound speakers
 * Timeline of Bose wave systems
 * Timeline of Bose stereo speakers
 * Delete per WP:INDISCRIMINATE. We don't need lists of every make of Bose product. The articles suffice. Nigej (talk) 12:03, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Geological category see also/core
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  13:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Template:Geological category see also was converted to Lua making these sub templates obsolete. Gonnym (talk) 10:39, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Geological category see also/core
 * Geological category see also/emit
 * Delete per nom. No longer needed. — hike395 (talk) 12:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lunar geological period
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  13:03, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused geological period template. Gonnym (talk) 10:36, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Lunar geological period
 * Delete as unused. Seems to be a modified version of Geological period. See discussion elsewhere: Templates for discussion/Log/2022 January 12. Nigej (talk) 13:12, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete (as creator) as unused. I had originally wanted this to serve as an equivalent template to the Geological Period template for the lunar timescale, but I superseded it with Infobox geologic timespan. Benniboi01 (talk) 16:56, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of Christianity in Wales
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Culture of Wales. ✗ plicit  13:04, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions, no incoming links. Recommend merging the most relevant links into Culture of Wales, which has a "Religion" subhead but no section to expand under the subhead. If this closes as "merge", and someone pings me, I'll be happy to perform a selective merge. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:24, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * History of Christianity in Wales
 * Merge Seems a very sensible way forward. Nigej (talk) 07:55, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of Australia/States
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  05:07, 20 January 2022 (UTC) No transclusions. These sidebars appear to have been abandoned in favor of their parent template, History of Australia. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:09, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * History of Australia/States
 * History of Australia/Chronological
 * Delete per nom. Nigej (talk) 07:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Western U.S. majority-minority counties
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗ plicit  13:06, 20 January 2022 (UTC) I am new to TfD so this might not be the best phrased argument, but this seems like a version of CROSSCAT for templates. I do understand all of these counties are Majority-minority counties, but that seems like not enough of a notable piece of information about these counties to group them together in a template. Maybe this might work a bit better as a category? <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 01:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Western U.S. majority-minority counties
 * Midwestern U.S. majority-minority counties
 * Northeastern U.S. majority-minority counties
 * Southern U.S. majority-minority counties
 * Delete No category could work better and this is a template for a niche topic that I don't think aids in terms of navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Clearly Midwestern U.S. majority-minority counties, Northeastern U.S. majority-minority counties and Southern U.S. majority-minority counties should be covered in the same discussion. We have articles like Majority minority in the United States, List of majority-Black counties in the United States, List of majority-Hispanic or Latino counties in the United States etc, which cover the topic in a better way. For a good navbox "The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent" and that's not the case here, simply because they're only connected by being majority-minority. Nigej (talk) 07:48, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Let me ping to see if they're on board with adding that as well as they already !voted, but I agree those templates should also be listed and if WCM is ok with that I'll list those as well. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 15:53, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * I support deleting those as well. The same issues are with those as with the template nominated. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 16:13, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Sweet, adding them in. <b style="color: #ea5a5a;">Tartar</b>Torte 16:44, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Proterozoic time scale
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 17:29, 20 January 2022 (UTC) Unused geological eon template. Gonnym (talk) 00:49, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Proterozoic time scale
 * Proterozoic 220px
 * Proterozoic fossil range/bar
 * Delete Unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:50, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment this also has a subtemplate, Proterozoic 220px that is unused except in this template. It should probably be bundled here -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 03:46, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Added here. – Jonesey95 (talk) 04:11, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Added another sub template of these. --Gonnym (talk) 10:31, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment (as creator): I created this template thinking it may be useful for Proterozoic lifeform pages like Dickinsonia, where the traditional Geological range template bar may not contain the time period it lived in and where the span of time being talked about is too short to make using Long fossil range justified. I haven't gotten around to requesting to add it to Taxobox or any other templates, though. Benniboi01 (talk) 17:10, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * What was the point of having both Proterozoic 220px and Proterozoic time scale ? They do exactly the same thing -- 65.92.246.142 (talk) 18:19, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Carbonate
<div class="boilerplate tfd vfd tfd-closed" style="background-color: #e3f9df; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete except IC50. ✗ plicit  05:02, 20 January 2022 (UTC) The above are all unused chemical related templates. Gonnym (talk) 00:45, 13 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Carbonate
 * Hydroxide
 * Sulfate
 * NO2-
 * NO3-
 * IC50
 * Delete All unused. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:51, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Delete per nom. User:GKFXtalk 19:26, 13 January 2022 (UTC)


 * Keep IC50 only, as creator. Not sure how it got into the list: it's not purely chemical (the IC50 article is in scope of WikiProject Pharmacology, per talk page), it's used (see List of phenyltropanes and 4-Nonylphenylboronic acid). Unlike other templates, it cannot be replaced with chem or chem2 Teaktl17 (talk) 18:32, 15 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Good point - happy to keep IC50. User:GKFXtalk 21:15, 19 January 2022 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).