Wikipedia:WikiProject Baseball/Peer review

 Article development path The peer review department of the Baseball WikiProject conducts peer reviews of articles on requests. The primary objective is to encourage better articles by having contributors who may not have worked on articles to examine them and provide ideas for further improvement.
 * 1) Start a new article
 * 2) Develop the article
 * 3) Check against featured article criteria and good article criteria
 * 4) Get feedback from WikiProject
 * 5) Get broader creative feedback
 * 6) Apply for featured article or good article status
 * 7) Featured articles and Good articles

The peer review process is highly flexible and can deal with articles of any quality; however, requesting reviews on very short articles may not be productive, as there is little for readers to comment on. Generally, most reviews will be conducted before nominating an article for Good Article or Featured Article status.

All reviews are conducted by fellow editors—usually members of the Baseball WikiProject. You do not need to be a member of the WikiProject to review an article.

If there are no articles below, or you want more articles, see Good articles/Candidates for articles currently Good article candidates. You should not approve any article that you were involved heavily in editing or reviewing here, but you could help another article reach GA.

Requests

 * No active requests

Old requests

 * WikiProject Baseball/Peer review/Compadre Stadium
 * WikiProject Baseball/Peer review/1919 Major League Baseball season
 * WikiProject Baseball/Peer review/Mets–Phillies rivalry
 * WikiProject Baseball/Peer review/2010 Texas Rangers season