Talk:Tyler Thigpen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good articleTyler Thigpen was one of the Sports and recreation good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
December 13, 2008Good article nomineeListed
June 28, 2009Peer reviewReviewed
September 20, 2012Good article reassessmentDelisted
Current status: Delisted good article

GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tyler Thigpen/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    Kaiser matias (talk) 22:11, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Peer review or none, I love it that there are Dolphin dorks that edited this page the moment he was traded. Hilarious. And I did keep this opinion to the talk page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.77.142.23 (talk) 03:51, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]