Category talk:Comfort women

On adding some categories to this category

 * I added Category:Prostitution in China,Category:Prostitution in the Philippines‎,Category:Prostitution in Indonesia and Category:Prostitution in Vietnam. And MR/MS STSC undid my editing. I added these categories to this category, because the comfort women of the Empire of Japan worked in these countries, as is described in comfort women. Please post your opinions. NiceDay (talk) 23:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
 * You obviously do not know how the categories work; just read H:CAT carefully. STSC (talk) 04:20, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * (To Mr/Ms STSC) Please point the section in Help:Category which shows that your act is right. NiceDay (talk) 09:34, 1 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I further suggest you study WP:CAT before you make any changes in categories, thank you. STSC (talk) 00:59, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * (To Mr/Ms STSC) I feel your comments as evation. May I judge that you have no clear reasons to oppose my suggestion ? NiceDay (talk) 06:52, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not up to me to teach you the mechanism of categorization; I directed you to two help articles and you still don't bother to read. Have you read? STSC (talk) 16:37, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

Of course, I have read Category and Help:Category. I did not ask you the mechanism of categorization. The fact that you did not quote my messages seems to me that you have never read my messages. Please answer my simple question whether you have read my message at 23:05, 30 June 2015 (UTC) with Yes or No. NiceDay (talk) 03:00, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, NiceDay. STSC (talk) 05:54, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your answer. Please answer whether the the following guess is right ? You can answer only with Yes or No. (Of course you can answer in detail.) You think that comfort women are not prostitutes. They are slave. That is the reason why you oppose to sub-categorize the Category:comfort women to etc. NiceDay (talk) 06:12, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * If you had read the help articles, you should have known what's wrong with your categorization. Maybe you don't understand. STSC (talk) 06:24, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I do not hurry. You do not have to answer quickly. NiceDay (talk) 08:13, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Your conversation is getting rather silly now, isn't it? STSC (talk) 08:34, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I am just making the question-and-answer session form, to know the reason why you oppose, because you won't to describe the reason. NiceDay (talk) 08:40, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Your mistake is obvious - "Comfort woman" was originated from "Prostitution in Japan" only, you cannot put other countries as its parent categories. STSC (talk) 09:16, 7 July 2015 (UTC)


 * (To Mr/Ms STSC) Thank you for your answer. I can understand what you thought. I write what I thought and I ask you one question. In comfort women there are next sentences There Stations were located in Japan, China, the Philippines, Indonesia, then Malaya, Thailand, Burma, New Guinea, Hong Kong, Macau, and French Indochina. It seems to me that the preposition in in means the location. So I added  etc. Why do you think that the preposition in does not mean the location ? NiceDay (talk) 01:37, 8 July 2015 (UTC)


 * That's not what I thought, that's how the categorization works. Let me put it this way: The comfort woman system was "born" from the prostitution in Japan, not other countries. Therefore 'Comfort woman' category is put under the parent category 'Prostitution in Japan' only. I don't want to waste my time on this please just let it rest. STSC (talk) 12:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm thankful for your continual discussing. I undeerstand what you think. I will finish the discussion, because further discussion between us cannot make consensus. Thank you. NiceDay (talk) 12:21, 11 July 2015 (UTC)