Talk:2014 mosque arson attacks in Sweden

Requested move 31 August 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: moved to 2014 mosque arson attacks in Sweden. Other proposed title created as a redirect. Jenks24 (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

2014 Sweden mosques arson attack series → 2014 Swedish mosques arson attacks – "Arson attack series", meaning a series of attacks, is grammatically incorrect and clunky. AusLondonder (talk) 17:28, 31 August 2015 (UTC) --Relisted. Natg 19 (talk) 01:36, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, not wedded to the proposed title, please suggest another if you wish. AusLondonder (talk) 17:34, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Suggest 2014 mosque arson attacks in Sweden GregKaye 09:18, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Propose
I propose that the page be moved to Arson attacks on mosques in Sweden. So that other more renent arson attacks on mosques could be added to this brief article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Why is it named "2014 mosque arson attacks in Sweden" when only one of the three contained any arson and the first wasn´t even an attack? 194.204.31.187 (talk) 09:48, 7 July 2022 (UTC)

Neutrality/ contradiction
This article was tagged in January 2020 by Tomastvivlaren (a ) for lack of neutrality/ contradiction. Coming to it as an outsider, I could see that when the events initially got swept up into a presumed sequence of attacks, early commentary would refer to 'three attacks' whereas subsequent analysis strongly suggests 'one accident, two attacks'. I have adjusted the text to reflect the latter, and propose (if nobody else does first) to remove the 'disputed neutrality' tag by the end of 2020. Yadsalohcin (talk) 09:15, 7 November 2020 (UTC)