Talk:2015 Kundby bomb plot

rename
Suggest rename to 2015 Kundby bomb plot.E.M.Gregory (talk) 12:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ✅ with the suggestion by User:E.M.Gregory.--Rævhuld (talk) 14:39, 4 June 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 4 June 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Consensus did not form around the alternative suggestion, while there was broad support for a move and most participants were fine with the suggested title and argued for it in line with consistency, which conforms with policy. (non-admin closure) TonyBallioni (talk) 04:24, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Kundby case → 2015 Kundby bomb plot – Consistency in name giving Rævhuld (talk) 21:29, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * I think the newly suggested name is not grammatically appropriate. — usernamekiran (talk)  21:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I am not a native speaker, so I can't see any grammatically mistake. Could you please explain what you mean? Thanks. <3--Rævhuld (talk) 21:45, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Kundby 2016 bombing plan; or Kundby 2016 bombing attempt. I think new name should be discussed with a few users. — usernamekiran (talk)  21:52, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * It's a pretty standard usage 1973 New York City bomb plot, 2005 Los Angeles bomb plot, 2010 Portland car bomb plot, 2007 bomb plot in Germany.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:01, 4 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Ah, I do see your point, User:Usernamekiran, Kundby 2016 bombing plan; or Kundby 2016 bombing attempt both sound fine to me.E.M.Gregory (talk) 22:03, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Wasn't it 2015? And aren't the rest of the articles written like Year Town Event?--Rævhuld (talk) 00:19, 5 June 2017 (UTC)


 * Support per nominator. Debresser (talk) 16:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support Kundby case is absurdly vague, on top of which it doesn't even accurately describe the article El cid, el campeador (talk) 18:18, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose rename it to "2016 Kundby bombing plan"; or "2016 Kundby bombing attempt". — usernamekiran (talk)  22:57, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Support move to 2015 Kundby bomb plot: clearer and standard-format title. Pam  D  23:02, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
 * "2015 Kundby bombing plot" is much better than "bomb plot". — usernamekiran (talk)  00:03, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Can anyone of you please move the article? I mean, we have discussed it since the 4th og July and only one was against it and 5 (?) for the move. So please move the article. Thanks <3
 * an editor involved in the discussion cant close it. No matter how clear the consensus is. Also, pings do not work if you dont put the tildes in. Pinging I still stand by "2016 Kundby bombing plan"; or "2016 Kundby bombing attempt". — usernamekiran (talk)   03:57, 17 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

New name
I think the article should be renamed to "2016 Kundby bomb plot". I was planned to be carried out in 2016 and she was also arrested in 2016. Doesn't 2016 make more sense?--Marginataen (talk) 12:46, 16 April 2023 (UTC)