Talk:2022 Hunga Tonga–Hunga Haʻapai eruption and tsunami/Archive 2

Please update with "Volcanoes and Climate: Sizing up the Impact of the Recent Hunga Tonga-Hunga Ha'apai Volcanic Eruption from a Historical Perspective"
Please add this info the the article. I featured it in 2022 in science, currently like so:

Atmospheric scientists report that the 2022 volcano eruption in Tonga, Pacific Ocean – the largest recorded volcanic eruption since 1991 which reportedly cooled global climate by ~0.6°C during 15 months – did not have a cooling effect (volcanic winter) of significance to global climate change (i.e. a cooling of ~0.004°C during the first year).

Moreover, I think this should be moved into a subsection of either #Impact or #Volcanic activity (where it is currently located without any subheader).

Please also update Timeline of volcanism on Earth (in the table there please also add a reference to the claim that the Mount Pinatubo lead to "Global temperature fell by 0.4 °C" – the reference I used above said around 0.6°C and not 0.4°C.

Then also add it to List of large volcanic eruptions (possibly by reverting this).

I think it would be good for both of those pages to include a very brief note about how much cooling was (not) caused / that not a lot or any significant cooling was caused.

I'll also post this to the talk of one of these pages and I'd like to avoid adding it myself, for example because I'm not that knowledgeable on volcanism / volcanoes.

Prototyperspective (talk) 20:30, 23 April 2022 (UTC)

Featured picture scheduled for POTD
Hello! This is to let editors know that File:Tonga Volcano Eruption 2022-01-15 0320Z to 0610Z Himawari-8 visible.gif, a featured picture used in this article, has been selected as the English Wikipedia's picture of the day (POTD) for December 9, 2022. A preview of the POTD is displayed below and can be edited at Template:POTD/2022-12-09. For the greater benefit of readers, any potential improvements or maintenance that could benefit the quality of this article should be done before its scheduled appearance on the Main Page. If you have any concerns, please place a message at Wikipedia talk:Picture of the day. Thank you! HurricaneEdgar   06:34, 10 June 2022 (UTC)

GVP bias?
The article appears to disregard VEI estimates by recent academic studies and go along strictly with the GVP's estimate. I don't think hiding the findings of academic studies is the way to go. --Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 12:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I don't believe GVP is biased. In many volcano articles on Wikipedia, they use the GVP. HurricaneEdgar    13:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I think that's more a suggestion of bias towards the GVP number. Poli and Shapiro (2022) give VEI~6, whereas Yuen et al. (2022) give VEI 5–6. Vergoz et al. (2022) give a value of VEI=5.8 - note that Poli and Shapiro are in that author list too. It's clear that VEI≥5 is well-supported, although using the higher number in the lede should perhaps wait until other groups weigh in. I don't see a problem of putting those other estimates in the article, even if we use the GVP figure in the infobox and the lede. We should perhaps mention the existence of other estimates in the lede, however. Mikenorton (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I should've titled the section better. I meant to say that the articles about this event seem to lean heavily to the GVP. I would think adding VEI 5–6 in the lead and infobox is an option to address the claims by multiple sources. Dora the Axe-plorer (explore) 23:59, 10 June 2022 (UTC)


 * It's also important to remember that the GVP is not the official determinator of the VEI of any eruption. The use of the GVP is just an arbitrary choice that has been made to help with consistency. The mention of other sources of info is just as important as the GVP number. I contacted the GVP about their VEI 5 value and they stated to me that this is just a preliminary value, not their final rating. Maple Doctor (talk) 00:26, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Deaths, injuries and missings
The table in the "Impact" section says there are only 4 deaths and 14 injuries in Tonga and under the "missing" column there is just "some", which is not even a number or an estimate. Maybe it was based on some early reports, but now that half a year has passed, do we have any better numbers? Betty (talk) 07:13, 27 June 2022 (UTC)

Comparison with Taupo Hapete eruption.
It transpires that the paper quoted the old pre 1995 discredited date for the Hapete eruption of 180 odd CE when corrected date is now accepted to be 232 ± 10 CE. See. I have clarfied the sense of the quote from the first paper which has a point in that the atmospheric injection event could well have been more extreme, if not so consequential as the Hapete eruption was likely to have been on biosystems. ChaseKiwi (talk) 20:47, 31 July 2022 (UTC)

Animated Image Is Distracting
The animated image is distracting and makes it difficult to read. Is there a consensus to hide it and pick a different image for the top of the page? chbarts (talk) 06:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

One year aniversary
Today marks one of the biggest eruptions in modern day history. Congrats to everyone who created this page till now. TheEasternEditer (talk) 18:34, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Audio of the Eruption Video
It is in dubstep TreborAl42 (talk) 06:56, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

bro who's trap beat is that 💀 Crazyeditor23 (talk) 14:02, 6 February 2023 (UTC)