Talk:Al-Darazi

Islamic sect?
Is it right to call the Druzes a sect of Islam. I think that neither they themselves or Muslims consider Druzism Islam. What about founder of the Druze derivation of Islam. --Error 00:15, 23 Feb 2004 (UTC)

Considering that they have long called themselves Muwahhidun, and virtually all Muslims regard tawheed as the preeminent and most pertinent truth, and that all true prophets and imams were musleem, I don't think it's unjustifiable to include them under Islam.

Come on! How many "Islamic" derivatives considered all other Islamic permutations non-Islamic. (Much the same for Christians.)

The real issue is that we denominate the Muwahiddun by the name their antagonists gave them, and which, unlike Quakers, Shakers, and whomever, never agreed to it. Since any comprehensive article will point this out -- just as several Wiki ones do now -- that should make everyone happy (of course nothing ever will!). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.234.242.137 (talk) 23:26, 19 March 2013 (UTC)

About the Hakim section
GreenEcho the book im referencing is a documentary that was written by more than one person. wikiperdia's NPOV policy states that you can balance the Article by other sources than having only one POV. and I balanced the article for you so please don't revert before checking the article and the policy. « Hiram 111 ΔTalK Δ 10:25, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I added a cite and cleaned up the writing - it was/is kind of poorly written and needs grammarnatin'.  Naahid بنت الغلان  Click to talk 13:02, 20 July 2008 (UTC)

Turk? or Iranian?
I personally hate this kinds of arguments but we really have to make this thing clear. Sources needs to support his Turkic identity. Every other sources I've found mentions Iranian identity, so does his name 'Anushtakin'.

Even if he was from a Turkic identity it doesn't mean he was a Turk. 'Turk' should be changed with word 'Turkic'. I'm editing and deleting the word Turk until sources are added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.182.186.148 (talk) 12:29, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 1 one external link on Ad-Darazi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120426105258/http://www.druze.ca/AboutDruze.html to http://www.druze.ca/AboutDruze.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at ).

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 19:20, 3 October 2016 (UTC)

Ad-Darazi as one of the seven prophets of the Druze (sic)
Incredible that it needs posting, but the article currently says "Ad-Darazi is one of the seven prophets of the Druze". It is an obvious mistake to anyone who knows a little bit about the Druze faith. It seems to have been a mistake - someone clearly mistook Muhammad ibn Isma'il (the founder of the Ismaili sect), one of the Druze's prophets, for Ad-Darazi, whose first and third names where also Muhammad and Ismail, but who is a totally distinct character and an antagonist to the Druze. The Ad-Darazi itself starts saying he is considered an heretic by the Druze. So I simply removed the second paragraph that says that Ad-Darazi is one of the seven prophets of the Druze, but it has been added three times back to the article, so I am just leaving this here for posterity so other people who stumble upon such blatant mistake in the Article's lead in the future will know they are not the only ones who laughed at it, but sometimes Wikipedia users like to keep Wikipedia wrong. Dan Palraz (talk) 22:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)