Talk:Antonie Brentano

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Antonie Brentano. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160305090947/http://www.lcweekly.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=780&Itemid=90 to http://www.lcweekly.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=780&Itemid=90

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:30, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

Immortal Beloved theory refuted?
The section that claims the immortal beloved theory was "only recently refuted" [when? where? by whom?] lacks any citation and seems to be original research. There is no citation and no evidence that any musicologist accepts this alleged refutation. I am unable to find any beyond what was added to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.5.208.9 (talk • contribs) 19:28, 25 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Agreed. These paragraphs are obviously either 'original research' or faulty interpretation of bona-fide research, couched in execrable English, lacking citations, and IMHO do not belong in this article at all. If no one objects within the next 5 days, I will take the liberty of removing the offending material. Awaiting input. -- Alphaten (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2019 (UTC)