Talk:Application Networks

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Daily pageviews of this article

A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org

Contested deletion[edit]

This page is not unambiguously promotional, because... (your reason here) --Alpharit (talk) 19:44, 7 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article states facts in a neutral way about a software company that existed from 1998 to 2006. There are no adjectives qualifying its products or customers. all the facts - existence - purpose of software - type of customers - acquisition are corroborated by media articles. Compared to other articles on Wikipedia about other companies the article is purposefully short and the style is sober.

If someone were to write a paper on the Risk management technology on Wall Street he or she would need to have an accurate picture of the players in that field. This company was a player until its acquisition by Reuters in 2006.

Alpharit (talk)

Is there enough evidence that it is independently notable on its own? As it is, why shouldn't this just be included at Reuters with a redirect there? -- Ricky81682 (talk) 01:52, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]