Talk:Archaeol

sn
is it positions 2- and 3- or 1- and 2-? see [stereochemical numbering]

Roadnottaken (talk) 22:31, 26 March 2009 (UTC)


 * It is 2 and 3. -- Ed (Edgar181) 20:04, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Incorrect structures
The chemical structures under section Biological role and synthesis are incorrect; the lower phytyl group is missing a methylene adjacent to the oxygen ether linkage.