Talk:Austria–Russia relations

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Austria–Russia relations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070317092815/http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/moynihan/programs/ces/pcconfpdfs/Kennedy.pdf to http://www.maxwell.syr.edu/moynihan/programs/ces/pcconfpdfs/Kennedy.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 06:51, 12 July 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 2 January 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved, although there's quite a bit interest in having a broader discussion about titles for bilateral-relations articles. (closed by non-admin page mover) Extraordinary Writ (talk) 05:57, 9 January 2022 (UTC)

Austria–Russia relations → Austro-Russian relations – Per WP:COMMONNAME. Current name shows no use, in google scholar or in ngrams. Between "Austro-Russian relations" and "Austrian-Russian relations", the former is the common name, with ten times more ngrams, and twice as many google scholar results. This is also backed by JSTOR results, with 107 for the proposed name, 7 for "Austrian-Russian relations", and no results for the current name. BilledMammal (talk) 04:41, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Support. Rreagan007 (talk) 08:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose. See every other member of the Category:Bilateral relations of Austria. None uses a demenym. Laurel Lodged (talk) 12:00, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per consistency with other similar articles. I don't like just spitting out "per consistency" on all RMs at bilateral relations articles but that's the situation currently. I think a discussion should be held at the WikiProject for bilateral relations to determine if we can break this consistency or not. After all, if this article is moved, barely some months later someone will probably request another RM for the article to be moved back due to consistency. It has happened countless times at Greek–Turkish relations. Super   Ψ   Dro  14:02, 2 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose on WP:CONSISTENT grounds. Same comment here as other move requests: currently, bilateral relations articles are all named without the adjectives; I however support a discussion on renaming the articles on the Wikiproject WP:INTR, possibly with a RfC. Pilaz (talk) 23:15, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose Common names for the countries are Austria and Russia, not the colloquial term the nominator is requesting the article to be named to. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:28, 7 January 2022 (UTC)