Talk:Book of Nathan the Prophet

About Stub
This is listed as a stub article. Realistically, what more is there to say about the topic? It is a lost book and the only description we have of its contents is already in the article. Because many people don't know which books are considered part of "the Bible", I think this article should be kept. But the stub designation probably should be removed. RickReinckens 23:39, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

Redirect?
I think that Nathan the Prophet should redirect to Nathan (Prophet) instead of here. It seems to make more sense to me, but then again I'm not a Christian. Does anyone else have an opinion on this? JSmith60 03:21, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree with you. -Kerplunk- 21:38, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
 * You can definitely have an opinion on a faith you don't believe, much like you can have an opinion on Star Wars or Harry Potter - as long as it's NPOV. OneWeirdDude (talk) 20:26, 29 May 2018 (UTC)