Talk:CFMMEU v Personnel Contracting Pty Ltd

Next GA
@Goldsztajn I hope you are well! I note that you indicated you would be happy to review another GA nomination someday! I thought I would let you know that this is my next GA goal. However, I won't be nominating for quite a while. It probably needs at least 50% more text, a picture or two, and a thorough proofread before I formally submit. If, and only if, you feel like it, please do have a skim and raise any red flags you can find. However, before submitting and making you do all the finding, I will be assessing every line against the feedback you provided in Dietrich, and so hopefully all the improvements you identified in the last can be made by me this time. There is the added benefit that I wrote this from scratch and no one else has significantly given input - so organisation and structure is much easier than the last which was a jumble of different texts I was not the contributor of. My aim is that you have to give as little feedback as possible in the next review, not because I do not want it, but because as the nominator I feel I should need less and less handholding and to get become more independent at writing - not all GA reviewers will be prepared to dedicate as much time to a review as you did the first. MaxnaCarta (talk) 00:19, 8 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Hi @MaxnaCarta - all sounds good. I've had quick glance at the article, my only initial comment is the final paragraph - it's not precisely clear why business groups would be satisfied with the decision, the second quote is somewhat suggestive, but a more explicit explanation would be helpful there. Regards, Goldsztajn (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2022 (UTC)