Talk:Cyber Troopers Virtual-On Marz

Fair use rationale for Image:Virtualonmarzbox.jpg
Image:Virtualonmarzbox.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cyber Troopers Virtual-On Marz. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050122173618/http://1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3110045 to http://www.1up.com/do/reviewPage?cId=3110045&p=2&sec=REVIEWS

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:31, 11 January 2018 (UTC)

Changing the Wording
Changed the phrase "tenth anniversary" to "ten year anniversary." I feel like the wording of "tenth" implies that the rerelease was made to commemorate the exact date while "ten years" implies that the game has existed now for 10 years. --H K Potton (talk) 11:55, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I have also changed the 'game context' section to actually have a description of the game, rather than just saying "Its awesome read the rest." While funny, I don't think the previous description provided a good enough explanation of what the game is like --H K Potton (talk) 12:18, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
 * I might also remove the line "The game does not feature any means to play with 4-players, and thus, falls short of making full use of the design behind the Virtual On: Force game system and rules." It is a subjective statement and I don't think is necessary for the article. --H K Potton (talk) 12:26, 5 March 2021 (UTC)

After extensive research, I cannot find any evidence that the game was ever released in PAL regions. As such, I think we should remove the "released in Europe later" line until we can find any evidence of it doing so. --H K Potton (talk) 14:23, 5 March 2021 (UTC)