Talk:Dar al-Ifta al-Misriyyah

Untitled
a picture? Victuallers (talk) 20:37, 3 March 2009 (UTC)

Article definitely needs POV tag
Note the bias inherent in the following phrases. Article needs, at least, POV tag until these are changed: MatthewVanitas (talk) 21:04, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
 * the premier institute
 * international flagship
 * It fulfills
 * clarifying the right way
 * revealing
 * opinions of jurists throughout history
 * important role
 * helping Muslims live their lives according to the principles of Islam so they may find happiness in this life and obtain the best reward in the Afterlife.
 * There are many issues with this article:


 * 1) Wikify: links need to be added coming out of and into this article.
 * 2) As MatthewVanitas has pointed out, there is inherent bias in the weasel words used.
 * 3) The lede gives little context to what the article is about.
 * 4) The references could be improved; secondary sources in English should be added to the article. Bearian (talk) 00:02, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I wikified and copyedited a bit, adding an Unref tag and 3 stub tags. Bearian (talk) 00:07, 4 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Agreed, needs work. It doesn't even say where in Egypt it is located. There's no critical discussion, no objective evaluation. Almost reads like an ad. Benefac (talk) 02:46, 28 June 2011 (UTC)

removing POV template without ongoing discussion per Template:POV instructions
I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
 * This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
 * There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
 * It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
 * In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 19:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)