Talk:Durham police mast

Utter garbage
This article makes almost little sense because whoever wrote it, wrote it for themselves and not for someone trying to understand the subject. Third sentence uses "urbated" which is even a word. It then doesn't make sense as the article lacks good clarity. Neither does it say where the mast was. Was it at the new site or the old one? This is what happens when it's just a copy paste job. Crap article. One the worst I have tried to read in a long time. 146.198.26.115 (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * If whoever wrote this crap actually knew where the tower was see here (during demolition), it would not have been such an arduous job trying to undertsanrd the article's facts in relation to the physical reality. 146.198.26.115 (talk) 20:46, 7 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your most constructive comments. If you looked at the edit history you'd see that "urbated" was recent vandalism which i have now fixed. The coordinates at the top of the page were the current location in storage, I've readded that later in the article. Not sure how you got confused about where the mast was, i think the article's fairly clear it was at the 1964 HQ - Dumelow (talk) 21:21, 7 December 2022 (UTC)