Talk:Francisco Ribera

Untitled
Entire post is Dubious, and should be removed immediately. Poorly sourced contentious material, One reference (Froom) is the only one footnoted.

NPOV
The article as it currently stands very much takes an anti-Futurist position and states certain biblical interpretations as if they were undisputed facts. While I personally agree with the position taken, it is certainly not neutral in the Wikipedia NPOV sense. -- 77.7.145.127 (talk) 20:04, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

The truth is the truth!!! There are numerous references to back up this position. If thorough research is undertaken it becomes evident the Catholic church was losing members because the bible, history, and the reformers point out this antichrist system. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.51.184.61 (talk) 03:05, 21 June 2011 (UTC)


 * I have edited the article in line with "neutral point of view". Charles Matthews (talk) 06:54, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

The article was probably written by Adventists. It was incorrect in several points (e.g. 7 years period of Tribulation). Ribera was half historicist, half futurist. Leszek Jańczuk (talk) 15:04, 15 August 2015 (UTC)

The issue is what's not mentioned, the Early Church Father who were futurists like Irenaus and Hippolytus.--JaredMithrandir (talk) 02:05, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
 * In the beginning, everyone - logically - was a Futurist. Str1977 (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2018 (UTC)