Talk:Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: Moved to Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque. There is consensus that a title with "Mosque" should be used, and that the possessive should not be used, but little consensus about precisely what title is best. I've chose this one because it agrees with the Gazi Husrev-beg article and seems fairly popular in academic sources (Books, Scholar), but I encourage editors to file another RM if they have good arguments for another title. Ucucha 18:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

Gazi Husrevbegova džamija, Sarajevo → — Relisted. --RegentsPark (talk) 16:54, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Undiscussed non-english article name move done by Dkusic1. ◅PRODUCER ( TALK ) 19:42, 12 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Support per undoing an undiscussed move. More affirmatively, support per WP:UE (use English) and WP:UCN (use common names) although I prefer Gazi Husrevbeg Mosque, the original title of the article, as more grammatical (possessive is usually used to show immediate possession).  —   AjaxSmack   00:52, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * What about "Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque"? It tends to yield more ghits.


 * "Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque" Web:7,650 Books:42  Scholar:14


 * "Gazi Husrevbeg Mosque" Web:119 Books:44  Scholar:7


 * or perhaps "Gazi Husrev-bey Mosque" should be used and the Gazi Husrev-beg article renamed in accordance as they yield more web ghits.


 * "Gazi Husrev-bey Mosque" Web:71,400 Books:55  Scholar:6


 * "Gazi Husrev-bey" Web:13,200 Books:438  Scholar:34


 * "Gazi Husrev-beg" Web:3,630 Books:599  Scholar:51   ◅PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 10:22, 13 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Support as per AjaxSmack the move to the preferible name Gazi Husrevbeg Mosque. --- Theirrulez (talk) 17:57, 27 May 2010 (UTC)


 * Why? Have you seen the statistics above? -- ◅PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 19:17, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
 * For google books Gazi Husrev-beg seems widely supported. If you add Mosque (necessary) you got the title IMHO preferible. Which title do you prefer, Producer? --Theirrulez (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Gazi Husrev Bey Mosque because it has the most overall ghits. However; as I said the biographical article Gazi Husrev-beg should be moved to Gazi Husrev Bey if this name is chosen. -- ◅PRODUCER  ( TALK ) 13:14, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

references: link defective
In the references the link Sells: Erasing Culture... is defective. It links to the Turkish Times but you see nothing there. --R. la Rue (talk) 21:46, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Gazi Husrev-beg Mosque. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426190738/http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/sightseeing/attractions/religious-sarajevo/gazi-husrev-beys-mosque/ to http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/sightseeing/attractions/religious-sarajevo/gazi-husrev-beys-mosque/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100426190738/http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/sightseeing/attractions/religious-sarajevo/gazi-husrev-beys-mosque/ to http://www.visitsarajevo.ba/sightseeing/attractions/religious-sarajevo/gazi-husrev-beys-mosque/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:59, 30 November 2017 (UTC)

Interior decoration
The statement “The old and faded layer of Austro-Hungarian decoration was removed and, since remains of older, historical layers of decorative painting weren't found” is highly problematic since the Ottomans usually decorated the interiors of their mosques. Sounds like whitewashing. 176.236.61.202 (talk) 01:31, 26 June 2022 (UTC)