Talk:Halo 4

Disambiguation
A disambiguation link should be included to differentiate it from the movie "Halo 4". Jbottoms76 (talk) 00:36, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Do you mean Halo 4: Forward Unto Dawn? I can't find much evidence it was ever referred to in common usage as just Halo 4 (for obvious reasons.) Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs ( talk ) 03:30, 4 January 2014 (UTC)

RTX vs Rooster teeth expo
I don't really care a great deal, but it would be nice if we discussed any changes here rather than edit warring. It seems at least one of the references calls it rooster teeth expo. Dbrodbeck (talk) 20:52, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Watch this : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R4TkMdbscok, the Creators of/people whom organize the event clearly state that RTX stands for nothing. Jump to 1:13:55 and you can quote Gus Sorola. (THE CREATOR AND MANAGER OF THE EVENT) and the wikipedia page for the event doesn't even say the word expo once, it doesn't matter how many sources you have that call it expo, if the creator and owner of an event says its not called that than its not, that would be like me arguing the microsoft's real name is apple even though i know bill gates calls it microsoft. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.159.27.116 (talk) 22:52, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

Good article nomination
I believe this article is ready to be a good article so I have just nominated it for good article status.--BarsofGold (talk) 04:20, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Is Halocharts.com a reliable source?
I'm unsure if the last sentence in the Critical Reception section is reliably sourced. It says: "Halo 4 had the fastest amount of population drop off for online play for any Halo game, with the total online population dropping below 300,000 players 8 days after release." The sources of information are a NeoGAF forum post and an IGN article which both cite data provided by Halocharts. I don't know how Halocharts obtains their data so I'm unsure if this analysis is reliable or accurate. The1337gamer (talk) 21:24, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Link to Sin (song)
I deleted the hatnote on top, but it was reverted by another editor citing WP:HATNOTE. However, Hatnote only appears to be a how-to guide; it doesn't seem to provide rules for whether an obscure, alternate name (and boy is it ever) truly warrants a mention on an article overwhelmingly more popular insofar as you could make the case that no one would ever search for the former. May we discuss this here? --DawnDusk (talk) 02:41, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * The song is referred to as "Halo 4" as well, thus the hatnote. However, I would have thought that guideline would have stated the need for a hatnote. In a case like this, the only other option would be to create a disambiguation page with only two entries, which is usually not done per WP:TWODABS and WP:TWODAB. And, as you have sort of said and which I agree with, the game is obviously the primary topic over the song (which is just a pseudonym), so thus the hatnote (instead of creating a disambiguation page). Steel1943  (talk) 03:00, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, now that I've looked at WP:HATNOTE, I should have cited WP:SIMILAR for the reason I reverted that edit. Steel1943  (talk) 03:02, 27 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Regardless of it being an obscure alternate title, it would be included anyway? I see; this makes sense (though I disagree with it and don't fully understand those pseudonyms). Thanks for clearing it up! --DawnDusk (talk) 03:05, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Regarding those pseudonyms ... yeah, I don't get them either!  Steel1943  (talk) 03:08, 27 March 2015 (UTC)