Talk:Hart Foundation

Revert
Requesting a revert as all information of the original Hart Foundation has been replaced with the Hart Dynasty. --Engimal (talk) 09:48, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Hart Foundation 2.0 at FCW
This is bull, isn't it? Can anyone confirm what is currently in this article about it? Markcookney 14:52, 28 June 2007 (UTC)

no it is true.

Reason Why Bret Hart Turned Down The Cowboy Gimmick
Bret Hart hated country music and that's why he turned down that cowboy gimmick. Mr. C.C. 09:04, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Is that in his autobiography?★Trekker (talk) 22:26, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Owen InMemory.jpg
Image:Owen InMemory.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 05:27, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Actually, he also didn't want to be the cowboy bret hart because he hates horses. He says hates, I say is scared of, but whichever it is, the horse is the reason! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.150.89.249 (talk) 14:25, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Natalie Neidhart
Should she still be listed as "Nattie Hart (Natalie Neidhart) (valet)" as of now she's performing rather than being a valet --- Вla  zze  ee   11:46, 4 May 2008 (UTC)
 * Well, this page is discussing the "Next Generation Hart Foundation", where she was just the valet, so I'd say, yes, leave it as it is. ♥ Nici ♥ Vampire ♥ Heart ♥ 12:38, 4 May 2008 (UTC)

AAA
The Hart Foundation 2.0 is in AAA (Mexico) it is made up of Teddy Hart and Jack Evans, they are being billed under the name and are actualy under contract unlike before since AAA brings in Foreigners without contracts all the time. The thing I think should be added is at Triplemania (AAA's Wrestlemania) they will team up with former ROH Champion Brain Danielson. Prince Bee (talk) 21:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Infobox
Shouldn't there be an infobox for each incarnation of the group? Tony2Times (talk) 18:48, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Their own page
Wouldn't it be better if The Hart Dynasty had their own page? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.33.159 (talk) 01:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I think they should get their own page in the future, because they are their own contingency, but as for now, I think this will suffice; when they become a stronger personality is when I would make a new page, but still include them in this article. Crippler4

Face turn against the Iron Sheik and Nikolai Volkoff in Boston in 1986
On August 9th 1986 in Boston Garden the Hart Foundation wrestled as faces against the Iron Sheik and Nikolai Volkoff. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.47.140.30 (talk) 15:58, 31 March 2010 (UTC)
 * it's not a "face turn" if they only wrestle one match against heels then going back to wrestling against faces, it's just a "heel vs. heel" match. Uncommon but it happens.  MPJ  -DK 16:10, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Just a question.
Would you not say that they were "pushed" after turning face? because after their loss to DX they were not that big anymore.--67.148.62.18 (talk) 07:12, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

Owen Hart and The British Bulldog tag team.
Shouldn't the Owen Hart and The British Bulldog tag team be mentioned more? The tag team is what got absorbed into the New Hart Foundation. Currently the article only mentioned them when listing one of their title wins.&#42;Treker (talk) 23:53, 5 December 2015 (UTC)

Orphaned references in The Hart Foundation
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of The Hart Foundation's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Tag": From The U.S. Express:  From Dan Spivey:  From Road Warrior Animal:  From Rikishi (wrestler):  

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:35, 5 January 2017 (UTC)

Split
I feel that the tag team and the stable should have their own articles, they're not really the same entity.★Trekker (talk) 22:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Requested move 20 August 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: not moved. As noted by many participating, each article should be considered on its own merits. Do open separate requested move discussion for each article. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 17:06, 27 August 2022 (UTC)

– Per WP:THE, "The" should generally not be used at the beginning of article titles. Moving these pages will comply with the style guide and standardise these titles with other titles. McPhail (talk) 12:22, 20 August 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * The Hart Dynasty → Hart Dynasty
 * The Hart Foundation → Hart Foundation
 * The Public Enemy (professional wrestling) → Public Enemy (professional wrestling)
 * The Samoan SWAT Team → Samoan SWAT Team
 * The Young Bucks → Young Bucks
 * The Bella Twins → Bella Twins
 * The British Bulldogs → British Bulldogs
 * The Royal Kangaroos → Royal Kangaroos
 * The Bollywood Boyz → Bollywood Boyz
 * The Backseat Boyz → Backseat Boyz
 * Oppose - Per WP:THE, the word "The" is capitalized if it would be used in running text. Further, it states that the stylization used by the group is essential in determining whether this is the case. To demonstrate this, it shows that some bands used "The" regularly on their albums and should therefore be referred to as such, while other bands did not (for example, The Bangles, but Eagles). Grouping all of these teams together doesn't make sense when they are to be considered individually rather than going for "standardization" that isn't required or encouraged by style guidelines. GaryColemanFan (talk) 23:02, 20 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per GaryColemanFan's reasonsings.★Trekker (talk) 05:16, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose all but Public Enemy Bad enough someone's already fucked up Te Killer Bees. What would Howard Finkel say? That's the only thing you need to ask yourself, man, who might reasonably call any wrestling group, InedibleHulk (talk) 05:31, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * And in case it's not obvious enough, Public Enemy wore their name on their shirts, before wallowing in your own merch was cool. They were visionaries. Not in the sense that they skunked The Vipers back in that November to remember, but they somehow knew future generations would one day forget the true meaning of . InedibleHulk (talk) 02:34, 22 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose The proposal is far too broad, each article needs considering on its own merits. GimliDotNet (talk) 11:45, 21 August 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per above. 162 etc. (talk) 21:04, 21 August 2022 (UTC)

Requested move 24 July 2023

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus that the leading article is not capitalized consistently in sources, and thus that WP:THE should prevail. (closed by non-admin page mover) ModernDayTrilobite (talk • contribs) 14:34, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

The Hart Foundation → Hart Foundation – Per WP:THE. McPhail (talk) 08:49, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. <b style="color: #FF0000;">Please do not modify it.</b> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Support Rreagan007 (talk) 07:20, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Support per nom. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:55, 25 July 2023 (UTC)
 * Weak support. WP:THE is not "get rid of all initial articles", so it would be helpful if the nomination gave some indication that it is written "the Hart Foundation" or "Hart Foundation" rather than "The Hart Foundation". It is easy to find sources capitalizing the "The" mid-sentence, such as, . However, there are others going the other way, and topics like "New Era Hart Foundation". So Hart Foundation seems fine. <small style="color: #667; background: white; border: 2px solid; border-radius: 4px; padding: 0 4px">SilverLocust 💬 10:00, 31 July 2023 (UTC)

Hart Dynasty
Is there any reliable source mentioning that The Hart Dynasty is related to this stable? Family connections don't prove they are connected. I also think the smaller and less significant derivatives should not have their own sections. BinaryBrainBug (talk) 11:32, 26 January 2024 (UTC)