Talk:Heraldic visitation

Comments for Improvement
I think it's an interesting and well written article, but I'm missing an exploration of the political background: why was it important for the crown to control the use of arms and the claims of gentility? Also it could benefit from a list of literature in addition to the notes, and perhaps also a picture, for instance the one that's on Garter Principal King of Arms? Eixo 22:44, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

GA failed
For the following reasons : Lincher 00:49, 22 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Lacking in references.
 * Too many red links. Done
 * There is some evidence ... and what are they? Done
 * Please rephrase this line The process did not begin in earnest, though, until the sixteenth century. Done
 * Needs at least a picture. Done
 * Give more details about the cease to use arms if used illegally and give examples if any are availables.
 * In what are the Scottish visitations different from the English ones. Done


 * How many references would be needed to make this a good article? For the length of the article, the inline citations seem reasonable.--dave-- 03:26, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

GA PASSED
This article has met the objections given it previously. Red

GA Sweeps
This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article, but there are issues that might be looked at for the future. Specifically, citation is barely enough for GA and should be more liberally used in the article to demonstrate that the topic has been properly covered by the references given. In addition, the lead is very short and does not provide effective context. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

GA status
This article is below par. The content itself seems relatively broad, but the referencing and layout just isn't up to scratch. There are whole sections without any citations at all, not to mention unreferenced innumerable claims in the better parts of the article. I've posted in the Heraldry wikigroup to see if someone wants to take this on, but I may be forced to remove the GA status, which would be a shame. Any one have the time/expertise/inclination to take this on? Sotakeit (talk) 08:51, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Heraldic visitation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110725141914/http://carmarthenshirehistorian.org/twiki/pub/Historian/HistorianVol20/vol20.pdf to http://carmarthenshirehistorian.org/twiki/pub/Historian/HistorianVol20/vol20.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:00, 2 November 2017 (UTC)