Talk:I Origins

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References to use[edit]

References to use. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 15:06, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Chaos theory[edit]

I don't think that the inclusion of Chaos theory in the See also section of this article is appropriate. Although Chaos theory is related to other See also entries, such as Irreducible complexity - Eye, it is not directly related to this article. I would like to eliminate the entry. The impression I have reading the See also list, is that the contributors had an agenda against or for creationism, which should not be the scope of this article.--Gciriani (talk) 21:29, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Studies[edit]

In § Plot:

A few months later, a Dr. Simmons calls and suggests they test the baby for autism. The doctor suggested running test on their child and because of the unusual test studies...

Impossible to tell whether studies or results is meant. --Thnidu (talk) 07:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC) Thnidu (talk) 07:53, 21 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Science fiction?[edit]

Is it really a science fiction film? It was fiction about science, but it did not meet the classical definition of science fiction. It was about, a philosophical concept. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 07:02, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): FWIW - seems the "I Origins" film speculates about a scientific notion - which may qualify it as a "science fiction film", by definition, I would think => A Science fiction film is a film genre that uses science fiction: speculative, fictional science-based depictions of phenomena that are not fully accepted by mainstream science... in any case - hope this helps in some way - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
This is not science fiction. --50.191.201.215 (talk) 23:08, 23 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]