Talk:Jace Hall

I doubt
I doubt this man or anyone else has played duke nukem forever. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikimakesmart (talk • contribs) 05:57, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on Jace Hall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120309163013/http://m.blogworld.com/speaker/jacehall to http://m.blogworld.com/speaker/jacehall

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 04:41, 24 January 2016 (UTC)

Purposed Changes
Hello Wiki,

It has come to my attention that my edits to Jace Hall's Wiki have been reverted due to COI. I was unaware of the rules surrounding this.

While I do know Jace Hall personally, I believe the edits that I had made were all done in a completely unbias and factual manner. The accuracy of this article is significantly lessened by removing the information that I had provided. All information that I had added was sourced. I am requesting that the following edit be reinstated.


 * 03:43, 19 October 2019‎

Thank you for the consideration — Preceding unsigned comment added by SincerelyFranny (talk • contribs) 19:24, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

Reply 23-OCT-2019

 * To expedite your request, it would help if you could provide the following information:
 * 1) Please state each specific desired change and accompanying reference in the form of verbatim statements which can then be added to the article (if approved) by the reviewer.
 * 2) The exact location where the desired claims are to be placed should be given.
 * 3) Exact, verbatim descriptions of any text and/or references to be removed should also be given.
 * 4) Reasons should be provided for each change.
 * In the section of text below titled Sample edit request, the four required items are shown as an example:

 1. Please remove the third sentence from the second paragraph of the Sun section:
 * "The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 25 miles in length."

2. Please add the following claim as the third sentence of the second paragraph of the Sun section:
 * "The Sun's diameter is estimated to be approximately 864,337 miles in length."

3. Using as the reference:

4. Reason for change being made:
 * "The previously given diameter was incorrect."

Regards, Spintendo  17:53, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Kindly open a new edit request at your earliest convenience when ready to proceed with all four items from your request. Also, please remember to sign all of your posts using four tildes. Thank you!

Issues

 * Aside from the COI issues, there are several flaws in the requested edit to restore deleted content. I will touch on but a few:


 * 1)- Advertisement/ promotion: In the section "Online Content Credited", 1337LoungeLive content is not sourced and was apparently purchased by the subject. Others are not sourced and the link to Warner Bros is simply advertising spam.
 * 2)- The "Sources" section has the same issues as #1. Links such as IMDb and Moby Games Database are not considered reliable sources, Twin Galaxies would be a primary source and the YouTube Official Jace Hall Music reference is primary and likely an inappropriate link.
 * The article is in dire need of expansion. What we currently have is a pseudo biography, and the sought additions still maintain this adding mainly just career accomplishments through largely inappropriate links and sourcing. What it amounts to is a BLP that could risk being deleted at WP:AFD (notability issues) in spite of 9 current references that includes Wikipedia (circular) and a suggested adding of 50 more references that include links like IMDb.
 * While the expansion of the requesting editor might very well be with good intentions there are strict policies and guidelines regarding COI editing, specifically paid, and the requested additions are by a single purpose account that has only acknowledged there is a COI.
 * The specific information, location, and sourcing needed before content might be added may seem extreme but the reason is because this is a BLP, the criterion is higher, and an uninvolved editor will likely never blanket add such a large amount of content considering the above circumstances. Otr500 (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2019 (UTC)