Talk:Johnnie Moore Jr.

Making a claim that he is a proponent of unqualified religious freedom really needs some sort of evidence of him doing just that for a religion beside his own. --   Alyas Grey   : talk 23:28, 9 August 2017 (UTC)

Paid editor with conflicts of interest
, who has for a been doing substantial edits to this article for a while, has now disclosed that they are paid by the subject's PR firm. Their edits need to be reviewed carefully. They are encouraged not to edit the article directly, but to suggest or request edits on this Talk page, due to their strong conflicts of interest. --Nat Gertler (talk) 23:43, 9 June 2020 (UTC)

Newsmax not a third-party source
In addition to the previously-expressed concerns about Newsmax as a reliable source, they are not a third-party source; as this article which had been used as a reference announces, Moore is one of their contributors. --Nat Gertler (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

The citation of EI and the associated content is highly questionable, is someone opposed to removal?
As it is depreciated per RFC: Electronic Intifada, I would say that it no longer meets the standard for inclusion in Wikipedia and should be removed, particularly as this is a BLP. Does someone disagree? FortunateSons (talk) 18:40, 24 January 2024 (UTC)


 * Not a full objection, but an uncertainty. The EI material is currently cited to two sources: the EI themselves, and an article that is mostly paywalled. If the paywalled article discusses that Moore was listed on EI, then that points to covering the EI listing as being WP:DUE. If it is due, then the EI link should be included. This is a matter that the EI would be considered reliable on, being that it's just their own opinion we're citing. (But even if so, the order of sources should be switched.) -- Nat Gertler (talk) 21:02, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * I removed the paywall here. Does that help? FortunateSons (talk) 21:11, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * As the article does not mention EI, it does not support the inclusion being due. I am fine with its removal. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 22:37, 24 January 2024 (UTC)
 * Removed, thank you FortunateSons (talk) 23:20, 24 January 2024 (UTC)