Talk:Keilschrifttexte aus Assur religiösen Inhalts

Notability concerns
None of the sources cited discuss this work in any depth or detail; rather, they analyze individual inscriptions that are included in this edition. To establish notability of a book, there should usually be at least two reviews of the book itself. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:52, 12 May 2024 (UTC)


 * Would these reviews + papers on it suffice?
 * * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1299180185?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals&imgSeq=1
 * * https://www.proquest.com/docview/1299165509?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true&sourcetype=Scholarly%20Journals&imgSeq=1
 * * https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/zava.1916.30.2.184/html?lang=de
 * Aside from these, it is not as easy to find sources discussing this volume in a general manner, but KAR has probably been cited thousands of times as a major compendium of primary sources in Assyriological studies. Most volumes will have a one or two page list of abbreviations at the start and KAR will be listed among them. I have also added sources showing KAR is one of the main sources of tablets for reconstructing the Enuma Elish. Pogenplain (talk) 00:49, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Those seem to be enough, although the first and second links are the same scholar. voorts (talk/contributions) 00:54, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Thank you, I have also added https://www.jstor.org/stable/23284290 Pogenplain (talk) 01:05, 13 May 2024 (UTC)