Talk:Levantine Arabic

Subtitled video: Reviewing Levantine text
I made Levantine Arabic subtitles for the video on this page. I barely ever read Levantine Arabic, so I'd love if someone could review the spelling and grammar of the subtitles: 1 00:00:02,826 --> 00:00:09,760 وهل شعب ل كتير بيشبه اللبنانية، يعني، بيشبه لبنان بمحبته للحياة، بالجمال.

2 00:00:09,840 --> 00:00:13,120 إنتو ناس حلوين، وهيدا الشي ما من شوفو دايمًا.

3 00:00:14,076 --> 00:00:19,480 المغاربة والمغرب كتير بيشبه لبنان بشكل الحياة إلّي هوّ في،

4 00:00:19,560 --> 00:00:22,160 فأنا حسي حالي ببيتي، وهيدا الشي بيفرّحني.

5 00:00:22,438 --> 00:00:28,200 أول شي، نوع الموسيئى المغربيّة هيّ أصلًا بتعجبني، والفَنّانين كلن

6 00:00:28,280 --> 00:00:32,240 وسعي الفنانين المغاربي إنون يروحو ع العالامية.

7 00:00:32,899 --> 00:00:34,960 وإنتو ئادرين توصلو للعالمية.

8 00:00:35,958 --> 00:00:41,800 وهيدا التعاون الئريب رح تحبو، إن ٱللَّٰه راد، بين أنا والفنان المغربي.

9 00:00:41,880 --> 00:00:42,840 إنتِ محتالة.

10 00:00:42,920 --> 00:00:46,720 بنتبه ع بشرتي كتير. هيدا الأهم. لأنُ إذا كانِت بشرتك حلوة،

11 00:00:46,800 --> 00:00:49,960 [بالإنكليزي] شو ما بطحطي ع بشرتك بلَمِع.

12 00:00:50,041 --> 00:00:51,200 [باللبنان] إذا لأ، ما بِبَيِّن.

13 00:00:54,160 --> 00:00:59,480 "شتركو" User:FunLater 22:06, 4 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Hi @FunLater, thanks a lot for taking this initiative! I've just asked a few native speakers I know to review it and I'll let you know. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you so much. FunLater (talk) 12:40, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Hi @FunLater, I was told:
 * "there are a few spelling choices that, while it’s not possible to say they’re incorrect as there is no standard spelling system, nonetheless I would recommend a different spelling
 * line 2, I’d spell it منشوفو as one word rather than two (من شوفو)
 * line 3 last word I’d spell it as فيه because here it means “in it”
 * line 4 second word I’d spell it حاسة
 * line 5 personally I’d spell it الموسيقى just to be consistent with MSA and other dialects
 * line 6 last word I’d spell it العالمية
 * line 7 I’d spell it قادرين again for the same reason as in line 5
 * there are a few spelling choices that, while it’s not possible to say they’re incorrect as there is no standard spelling system, nonetheless I would recommend a different spelling
 * oh and line 8 I’d spell it القريب
 * a lot of my spelling choices are “classicizing” I do realize, but it also helps facilitate cross-dialect recognition as well"
 * So I assume it's a matter of personal preferences and you can keep your subtitles or choose the above suggestions. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 08:07, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you, both of you. I applied all changes and added the subtitles in the Arabic slot, since there isn't one for Levantine.
 * Make sure to thank them and let them know that they can edit the subtitles here if they want to change anything: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/TimedText:Maya_Diab_interview_in_Morocco_-_Oct_28,_2017.webm.ar.srt FunLater (talk) 13:33, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks a lot! I think the language code should be 'apc' instead of 'ar' if possible. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 14:32, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * The usual dropdown for selecting languages doesn't show Levantine. I tried manually putting the code as apc, but it's not showing in the video player, so I asked at Commons' helpdesk. FunLater (talk) 19:20, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * @FunLater Thanks! a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 19:43, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
 * A little late, but the issue is fixed now. FunLater (talk) 14:26, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Levantine Arabic Wikipedia as a section
Hello @A455bcd9!

First of all, thank you for everything you did to help make this article a featured article. I truly appreciate all your efforts, and it is a very well-written piece!

Meanwhile, I need to say that I disagree with your decision to revert my last edits, so would like to have a discussion, if possible. My argument is: Overall, I believe the content has encyclopedic value since the Wikimedia Foundation is a notable entity and the LC is representing the WMF here. I would appreciate it if you could reconsider. @FunLater: Curious about your opinion on this matter as well, if you have time. TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 08:37, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Meta can be considered a reliable source for the information that was included in the subsection: The text says that the project is determined to be eligible by the Wikimedia Foundation Language Committee. Even if you consider the dynamic page to be unreliable (since it can be vandalized) I can link to that particular edit or the static page as a reference, which cannot be altered, and is a perfectly reliable source for the statement being made WP:RAP. Also we can add the language committee's mailing list discussions, which would provide an additional reliable sourcing. The mailing list is open to the public.


 * Verifiability is not a problem here, but a Wikipedia edition is rarely if ever significant enough to discuss in the article about a language. Nardog (talk) 09:14, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Nardog Indeed. We can only add content backed by reliable sources. So if for instance a reputable newspaper talks about the efforts around creating a Levantine Wikipedia, then we could mention it and it would be very interesting. But we don't have that. Unfortunately. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 09:57, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Indeed what? I just said verifiability isn't a problem here. We could totally discuss the Wikipedia without a reliable source, as far as is allowed by WP:ABOUTSELF. I just don't find it pertinent to the subject, and that's a matter within editorial discretion. Nardog (talk) 10:08, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * @Nardog We cannot use Wikimedia projects as a source per WP:CIRCULAR. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 10:34, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * "An exception is allowed when Wikipedia itself is being discussed in the article." Nardog (talk) 11:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * You're right, sorry. a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 11:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * I think verifiability-wise the section is/was okay, but the wiki is unfortunately not (yet) significant enough to warrant its own section. FunLater (talk) 11:04, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Even Scots' article doesn't mention its wiki version, despite The Incident. FunLater (talk) 11:09, 4 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Exactly. Nardog (talk) 11:11, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

"Levantine speakers in Turkey use the Latin-based Turkish alphabet."
Is there a reason to not add the Turkish alphabet to the infobox? FunLater (talk) 23:16, 10 March 2024 (UTC)


 * I don't think it's necessary. We have "Latin script", which encompasses all Latin-based alphabets, including the Turkish alphabet. Similarly, Levantine speakers (esp. in Lebanon) might use the French é or French based-spellings (ch instead of sh for instance) but we don't list "French alphabet" in "Writing system". a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 11:52, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Okay, cool. :) FunLater (talk) 11:55, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

Recent reversion of change from "Arabian" to "North Arabian"
While the source only says "Arabian", other sources referencing the same group refer to it as "North Arabian" to avoid ambiguity with Old and Modern South Arabian. Listing it as merely "Arabian" only creates ambiguity. Arctic Circle System (talk) 21:43, 14 March 2024 (UTC)


 * The source says Arabian, so we write Arabian. Unless we have a better reliable source for the whole classification tree? (and not just for "Arabian", we don't do a patchwork of RS). a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 08:26, 18 March 2024 (UTC)

Significance of knowing the Arabic script
I think the below statement in the article is problematic because it implies that if one speaks Levantine Arabic, then it is expected that they would know the Arabic script. This expectation contradicts that this language is mostly a spoken language. E.g., if I found a source that says they don't know the Hebrew script, could we have added it to the article? It doesn't matter if the source says this, the sources, even if reliable, may propagate the existing biases. Also if you click on the link given for "illiterate", you can see that it does not describe the situation of Levantine speakers in Turkey. They use Levantine Arabic as their conversational language, and mostly Turkish as their professional/academic language. Labeling this as a form of illiteracy is misleading. Since this is a featured article, even if this is a small matter, I think it would be helpful to have a discussion. @FunLater, @Nardog, @Buidhe: curious about your thoughts. "In Turkey, article 42.9 of the Constitution prohibits languages other than Turkish from being taught as a mother tongue and almost all indigenous Arabic speakers are illiterate in the Arabic script unless they have learned it for religious purposes." TheJoyfulTentmaker (talk) 16:11, 20 July 2024 (UTC)