Talk:List of South American stadiums by capacity

Isidro Romero Carbo official capacity
This article and the List of football (soccer) stadiums by capacity say that the capacity of the Isidro Romero Carbo is 75,000 but the articles Barcelona Sporting Club and Estadio Monumental Isidro Romero Carbo say that the capacity is 89,932. Which one is true? MicroX 01:54, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on List of South American stadiums by capacity. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150218033310/http://www.fortalezaceara2014.com.br/noticia/castelao-reuniu-quase-300-mil-pessoas-na-copa/ to http://www.fortalezaceara2014.com.br/noticia/castelao-reuniu-quase-300-mil-pessoas-na-copa/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20150826005108/http://www.minasarena.com.br/faq/ to http://www.minasarena.com.br/faq/
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131204185846/http://www.internacional.com.br/pagina.php?modulo=16&setor=195 to http://www.internacional.com.br/pagina.php?modulo=16&setor=195
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100428064010/http://www.fuerzatiburona.com/estadio_metropolitano.html to http://www.fuerzatiburona.com/estadio_metropolitano.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:20, 27 December 2017 (UTC)

How long do we want this list to be?
Recently, User:77.169.189.99 has made some good-faith edits to this list article, adding a number of links to stadia with capacity < 30,000. This is the cutoff number that has been used for many years, and although arbitrary, it seems like a good fit here. However, with these new additions, the article has nearly tripled in size The result is a list that is much too long and a less useful article. Discussion welcome - is this expanded size what's best for the article? 162 etc. (talk) 16:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)