Talk:List of diplomatic missions of South Korea

Discussion at WP:FOR on formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" article
There is now a discussion at WP:FOR on the formatting and content of "List of diplomatic missions" articles. As this discussion ostensibly could affect this article, editors are encouraged to provide their opinions on the WP:FOR at this link - Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_International_relations - please do not discuss on this article talk page as valid points for consideration may very well not be seen by editors at large. Thank you, --Russavia Dialogue Stalk me 00:19, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

New embassy establishment
South Korea opened the embassy in this year Bolivia, Cameroon, Kyrgyzstan and the People's Republic of Congo democratic republic. leeswoo00 Dialogue 00:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

"Republic of China" (Taiwan)
Didn't the Republic of Korea (RoK) establish diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China in 1972? Didn't the RoK end diplomatic relations with the Republic of China at the same time?

Of course I know "Yes" is the answer to both of the above questions. So why does the article say the RoK has a diplomatic mission (which requires diplomatic relations) with the Republic of China?

I think the answer is probably not based in fact but rather in politicial propaganda. I will remove it. Before reverting my edit, please provide a source for when the RoK reestablished diplomatic relations with the Republic of China.

For my part, there are many many sources showing that the RoK long ago ended its diplomatic relations with the Republic of China and established its diplomatic relations with the People's Republic of China. This following is a link to the "Five Principles of Chinese Foreign Policies By Pobzeb Vang" publication which includes the full text of the "Joint Statement of the Government of the People's Republic of China and the Government of the Republic of Korea" of 1992. 

Regards. Redking7 (talk) 12:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * I've never edited the article, but somehow is on my watchlist for housekeeping. Please assume good faith on editors who have worked on the article and do not spill the talk page with your nationalistic agenda or propaganda.Articles on Wikipedia is written by volunteers most of who are non-experts, so sometimes some information are regretfully inaccurate and written without sources. So people are working together to fix the well known problems. Thankfully, you found the addressed issue should be fixed, so you're free to edit the page with reliable sources. Then problem would be easily fixed, and no need for drama making.--Caspian blue 12:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * After quick checking on your contribution, you have a strong political agenda for Taiwanese diplomatic matters given your almost same opinion left on the talk pages of Japan, United States, United Kingdom and others.--Caspian blue 12:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * You talk of good faith and then accuse me of a "nationalistic agenda" etc. I make no secret that I am trying to tidy up these "RoC/Taiwan" entries on various lists - I've raised the issue on a few. I am interested in an accurate set of articles...Unfortunately, past experience has shown me that there are indeed political agendas at play and some editors will ignore sources etc. and insist on including "RoC/Taiwan" even where it is clear that its inclusion is bogus. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 15:19, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * ps, if it makes you think any better of me (I care about what you think)...See my edit on the List of diplomatic missions of Haiti list - you will see I apply the same logic where the reverse is the case (i.e. in that case the People's Republic of China was listed when it should not have been.....Haiti recognises only the Republic of China (i.e. Taiwan) and I amended the list accordingly. I'm even. NO political bias. Just sticking to the facts. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 15:27, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
 * If you want to fix information, then you don't need to falsely accuse that the articles had bee written by propaganda. That is offensive and your argument looks just highly biased. If you want to look yourself neutral, then please do not leave that comments everywhere. No need to make a fuss.--Caspian blue 15:35, 5 September 2009 (UTC)


 * I guess my experience is what i go by in these things. Any way, can you give any other explanation for the inclusion up to now of RoC/Taiwan other than politics/propaganda....I'm afraid its the only plausible explanation. Regards. Redking7 (talk) 20:24, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 17:55, 31 January 2022 (UTC)
 * ペルーのリマにある韓国大使館.jpg