Talk:List of largest hydroelectric power stations

Numerical rankings
Am I missing something? Aren't the numerical rankings supposed to correspond to the total capacity? 199.91.34.33 (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Yes, some one made a mistake in adding a dam, so I changed it, but then I messed up the ranking, help me please. Calvingao (talk) 03:54, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Help
AMTRYING TO FINE OUT IN THE LATE 1990'S WHAT PLACE DID OREGON RANK IN THE USA HYDRCELECTRIC PRODUCTION —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.224.211.118 (talk) 22:02, 8 August 2008 (UTC)

Wut about teh Aussie one? XXx NoobSlayer xXx (talk) 03:15, 5 July 2016 (UTC)

Proposed segmenting
Hello. Please have your say at the proposed segmenting of this article. Do respond there. Thanks. Rehman(+) 12:34, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Table for under construction dams
There should be a table for dams under construction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Simfan34 (talk • contribs) 21:20, 27 May 2011 (UTC)

Cut-off
As we already have List of conventional hydroelectric power stations and it was decided to keep both articles, i think this article should be concentrated to largest power stations only. Now this article has 2 000 MW border and noted article 1000 MW. I think we can raise this article border to 3 000 MW and continue to add more data to these largest power stations. --Jklamo (talk) 20:06, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Snowy River Hydro Scheme
In Australia the Snowy River Hydro Scheme is about 3500 MW capacity, but doesnt make the list ??? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.211.86 (talk) 06:09, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of largest hydroelectric power stations. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140826115750/http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-09/06/c_131832819.htm to http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012-09/06/c_131832819.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303232204/http://www.yn.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2010-08/25/content_20718495.htm to http://www.yn.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2010-08/25/content_20718495.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 02:42, 31 December 2017 (UTC)

Robert Bourassa Dam
It doesn't make sense to separate Robert Bourassa and La Grande 2-A. Both are simply separate turbine/generator complexes at the same dam, with 2-A being a second phase. Many other dams, like Guri and Grand Coulee, have had later phases add capacity to the dam, and none of them are counted as separate power stations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgwohu (talk • contribs) 19:57, 7 March 2018 (UTC)

Xiangjiaba Dam is 7750 MW
Xiangjiaba Dam is 7750 MW The power station’s installed capacity is 7.75 million kilowatts (eight 800-megawatt giant turbines and three large-scale turbines of 450,000 kilowatts), and the average annual power generation is 30.747 billion kilowatt-hours. https://www.reduper.com/industry/energy/power-station/hydro/xiangjiaba-dam/ 2001:B011:C040:2444:989B:6271:875:3A3C (talk) 17:35, 14 June 2023 (UTC)