Talk:Lycian Way

Comments
I think it might be notable. It's been in the media: the Observer June 4 2006 according to my own research. according to the trail site http://www.lycianway.com/ it and the st. paul trial have been in a lot of magazines, but some of their selected articles are about the area, not the trail.Sci girl 21:36, 28 May 2007 (UTC)

www.lycianturkey.com
The section "Hiking path description" is copied from http://www.lycianturkey.com/lycian-way (or possibly vice versa). I came across this trying to find a reference for the "citation needed". Personally I would think that a article called "Lycian Way" is almost forced to include sections from www.lycianturkey.com so this is not a problem but does it make sense to reference the identical text from a source article? Maybe it is best to make a single prominent reference to www.lycianturkey.com near the beginning and take anything in that as being suitably referenced. Mtpaley (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2015 (UTC)
 * It looks like a blatant copyright violation. The edit is performed by user:85.99.86.217 in 2007. The text from www.lycianturkey.com is from 2006: . I will erase the copyvio. &mdash; fnielsen (talk) 23:35, 11 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Lycian Way. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120204045045/http://www.lycianturkey.com/ to http://www.lycianturkey.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)