Talk:Nautica

Fair use rationale for Image:Nauticalogo.JPG
Image:Nauticalogo.JPG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

1983?
The inside label of my Nautica sweater reads:

Nautica Jeans Co. Established 1999

That date of 1983 has to be validated by another source. NERVUN (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
 * The company "Nautica" was founded in 1983. In 1999 the company created a subsidiary company called "Nautica Jeans" WRobertson 01:57, 21 February 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wrobertson (talk • contribs)

Peacocking by anon user
Apparently semi-protection was ineffective at preventing a particular anon user from disruptively adding peacock terms to the article, since the user has since returned. Semi-premium is a fair and accurate descriptor for the brand, since it is generally priced above mid-range brands such as IZOD and Chaps, but below premium brands such as Tommy Hilfiger and Polo Ralph Lauren. The fashion industry has different segments, although while subjective, the most common segments are economy, mid-range, premium, and luxury. IZOD and Chaps fall under mid-range, while Tommy Hilfiger and Polo Ralph Lauren fall under premium. Since Nautica doesn't clearly fit in neither mid-range nor premium, semi-premium I think is a good way to describe the brand. ANDROS1337 TALK 23:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Requested move 26 July 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: moved per request. Favonian (talk) 19:09, 2 August 2022 (UTC)

– Per WP:PRIMARYTOPIC, the clothing company is by far the most notable use of the word. ANDROS1337 TALK 17:26, 26 July 2022 (UTC) The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Nautica (clothing company) → Nautica
 * Nautica → Nautica (disambiguation)
 * Support 1st, oppose 2nd Per WP:TWODABS, the disambiguation page should simply be deleted (or at least, swapped with the clothing company), not moved elsewhere. A hatnote is sufficient. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 07:02, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Support both: have slightly expanded the dab page. Pam  D  08:06, 27 July 2022 (UTC)
 * Support both, same as PamD. Dekimasu よ! 08:10, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

To add to article
To add to this article: even a single image of an article of Nautica-brand clothing. How can we consider our project encyclopedic if we're lacking something this basic? 76.190.213.189 (talk) 01:52, 15 January 2023 (UTC)