Talk:People's Democratic Front (Indonesia)

Politics: Political parties Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Political parties task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Indonesia Low‑importance

	Indonesia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indonesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Indonesia and Indonesia-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IndonesiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndonesiaTemplate:WikiProject IndonesiaIndonesia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Socialism

	Socialism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Notability[edit]

Without any references, the wp:notability has been questioned by me twice (I hadn't realised I'd done it twice independently while coming from the dab, no edit warring involved). The information is currently not verified, and may be verifiable and notable. Until that point, a notability tag only helps highlight this, and removing it without indicating a source seems a problem. (the two other language articles also have no sources) Widefox; talk 13:54, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I added some references now. However, an important point is that unreferenced articles aren't inherently non-notable. In this case the material in the article, albeit unreferenced, clearly clarified the notability of the organization in question. --Soman (talk) 04:01, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Soman Great. Agree, but not with the last bit...material in the article does not per WP:NOTEWORTHY. When challenged per WP:NRV " However, once an article's notability has been challenged, merely asserting that unspecified sources exist is seldom persuasive, especially if time passes and actual proof does not surface. ". per WP:FAILN, regards Widefox; talk 08:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]