Talk:Police abolition movement

April 2023 edits
We've got an edit war brewing. I would love to see the IP editor justify their changes, which appear to be original research. For example: "In making this claim, abolitionists usually do not address the role of the police in situational intervention in active incidents of violence" is unsupported by any citation, and the later cited source just supports the direct quote from Ritchie was not made in the context of commentary on active incidents of violence. Pinging editors who reverted the content, will drop a note at the IP's talk page. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 14:08, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Looks like WP:NPOV violation to me - I don't think it necessarily wrong to modify the tenor of the article and mention that many people do want there to be a police corps (but not a lawless one), but the IP edits appear rather biased to me. Best,  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  14:11, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah I was monitoring recent changes and it was flagged for vandalism so after reviewing the edits I came to the same conclusion hence why I reverted those edits. After my edit was reverted I figured I would just give the whole thing some space since the editor seemed pretty upset. I'm pretty new to addressing vandalism and edit wars so I figured a more experienced editor would be better suited to handle this. I left a note on the ip editors talk page about their tone in the edit summaries.  Dr vulpes  (💬 • 📝) 19:05, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * IPs essentially have a free hand to edit war; WP:3RR is toothless since they will just use another IP and they lose pretty much nothing. You can report them but the time and effort are not commensurate with the potential benefits.  Mr.choppers &#124;   ✎  19:45, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
 * I reverted per this discussion and linked this section in my edit summary. Hopefully the IP joins us to talk it out. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 16:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)