Talk:Raw foodism

"Claims made by raw food proponents are pseudoscientific."
Does anyone else find this statement reductive and dismissive? How about something like: "Many claims made by raw food proponents could be categorized as pseudoscientific." It just doesn't make sense to insinuate that every claim made by a raw food proponent is pseudoscientific. Wowisaac (talk) 06:09, 11 August 2023 (UTC)


 * @Wowisaac This article is not written with a neutral point of view. 143.55.89.242 (talk) 18:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)

"A Hovannessian" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=A_Hovannessian&redirect=no A Hovannessian] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Dsuke1998AEOS (talk) 15:00, 11 March 2024 (UTC)

"Living foods diet" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Living_foods_diet&redirect=no Living foods diet] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Utopes (talk / cont) 05:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)