Talk:Rumble Racing

Fair use rationale for Image:Rumbleracing boxart.jpg
Image:Rumbleracing boxart.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Why I tagged it as "review"
Phrases such as "Either way, each car is an excellent choice to use to win." or "However, after you complete all of the cups, there are still 10 or so remaining cars that are locked. You may obtain these by two ways:" sound to me like a guide/walkthrough/review to the game. I was tempted it as an essay or fansite, but review seemed most appropriate. Thoughts? Iotha 05:10, 4 August 2007 (UTC)

Modcar 2A0D:3344:161E:F510:6987:B777:3E16:8709 (talk) 19:20, 15 June 2024 (UTC)