Talk:Sadiq Sanjrani

8th chairman
Why would someone remove the ordinal number? --Saqib (talk) 15:08, 12 March 2018 (UTC)
 * In my opinion the ordinal number do not need to appear again and again in the article, info box is good enough but I let it stay after comparing with other articles such as Donald Trump, for example.  Sh eri ff  |  ☎ 911  | 11:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Un-encyclopedic?
Hi This is concerning your removal of some edits. One lesser-known politician with no prior legislative experience becomes Chairman of the Senate out of nowhere. I'm curious why is that not encyclopedic? Maybe wording was not perfect? In my opinion, this passage easily passes WP:10YT and is informative from encyclopedic POV. Whats your thoughts? --Saqib (talk) 10:51, 17 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I changed the wording and restored the content, before it appeared as if it was a nickname for him!  Sh eri ff  |  ☎ 911  | 11:56, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Care to explain...
...why you removing some basic information such as ? . --Saqib (talk) 08:35, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * See Donald Trump, the basic info is missing. It can be wrote in this way. Every article can’t be the way you want it. Let others edit as well.--Ridhej.dhhes (talk) 08:42, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * We do not go by examples here on Wikipedia. By the way, Why don't you stop socking and ask your original account to be unblocked? --Saqib (talk) 08:45, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
 * Donald Trump is not a good example here, Barack Obama and Nancy Pelosi are (check those), every two individuals are different, if you can better explain your objection to describing him as a politician then I might be able to give a counter argument otherwise removal of information just on the basis of another article is not a good idea. Can you please stop removing that same information from other articles as I might tend to report you for disruptive editing. Sheriff &#124; ☎ 911 &#124; 10:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)