Talk:Saint Patrick's Seminary and University

Unsourced section in article since 2008
If this section as tagged is not sourced within the next week, it will be removed as per the tag. Two years is too long for that section to exist as unsourced. --Morenooso (talk) 21:23, 20 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Section was removed as per its maintenance tag and this section. If added back, it will need citations. --Morenooso (talk) 19:55, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

Unsourced tag added 2010-04-26
While this article does have a Sources section, the article does not have a References section. The Unsourced tag template was placed on the article. New additons can be challenged and removed if they are not cited. --Morenooso (talk) 19:57, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Removal of the Cat technically falls in this maintenance's tag description. This seminary is accredited and the cat should remain until diffused or removed. At that time, a bot will remove it. --Morenooso (talk) 20:16, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Morenooso, I removed the cat for reasons that have nothing to do with sources or accreditation. I've replied in more detail on your talk page.  Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 02:13, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * I've read and still no consensus. --Morenooso (talk) 02:14, 27 April 2010 (UTC)

My list goes on. When valid cats, exist there is no need for diffusion. When cats are deleted, the flavor of the week bot will be by shortly to rectify the cat. --Morenooso (talk) 03:31, 27 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Bessie Coleman
 * Benjamin O. Davis, Jr.
 * Mako Iwamatsu

Recommendations for article improvement

 * Infobox
 * Picture
 * Low-res logo
 * Famous graduates --Morenooso (talk) 19:59, 26 April 2010 (UTC)
 * A disambiguation page for "St. Patrick's Seminary" with a link to this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.122.210.116 (talk) 17:49, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Cleanup tag added 2010-04-27
The WP:LEAD paragraph is too long, has the wrong tone and reads like an ad. Some of the information should be moved to other applicable sections. Citations are still lacking but improving. Article can stand a good or great copyedit. --Morenooso (talk) 01:16, 28 April 2010 (UTC)

Third Opinion on Categorization
Copied from User_talk:Morenooso — T RANSPORTER M AN  ( TALK ) 15:23, 3 May 2010 (UTC)