Talk:Science Fiction Quarterly

a small issue
Hi User:Mike Christie, I have translated quiet a few articles recently about pulp magazines that you wrote, but just found a small issue on this one.

Section "Bibliographic details", third paragraph, about UK issues, which didn't list a specific source. I could found some infomation at ISFDB page, I'm not sure if this is the right title, look like the same editor & publisher, if so, then lots of infomation provide at this paragraph, like "128 pages", were wrong. Could you help me out here, thank you.--Jarodalien (talk) 14:02, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks for spotting that. The ISFDB data is sourced to the Contento/Payne/etc. index, which I think is reliable enough to overturn Ashley's information.  I added Ashley as a source -- not sure how that got lost -- but also added the ISFDB link and changed the article text to use that source.  Let me know if you have any other questions, about this or any other magazine. Mike Christie (talk - contribs -  library) 14:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)
 * Thank you User:Mike Christie for fix it so quickly. I will as long as my VPN not been block. BTW, Amazing Stories Quarterly, Famous Fantastic Mysteries, Fantastic Novels, Ghost Stories (magazine), Marvel Science Stories, Science-Fiction Plus, Tales of Wonder (magazine), Satellite Science Fiction, Fantasy Book were all listed good articles at Chinese wikipedia within last couple of weeks.--Jarodalien (talk) 15:03, 6 June 2020 (UTC)