Talk:Separation of powers in Hong Kong

Submission of Article
When the article is moved to draft, the respective Wikipedian, MarkH21, said "Viable topic with GNG coverage in RSes, but currently a WP:POVFORK consisting solely of primary documents". I think he need to elaborate his point of view further, at least how the article should be improved, instead of moving the entire article of 10,000 words to the draft page without any discussion nor intention of discussion, and only leave his point of view in 10 words.--D7CY689 (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * Meanwhile, he moved the entire article to the draft page, but he didn't notify me in my talk page though I am the creator of this article. I just know that the page is moved to the draft page by accident. I can be totally unaware after the page is removed.--D7CY689 (talk) 02:55, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
 * The scope of this article, "Separation of powers in Hong Kong", is covered by multiple secondary reliable sources which can be used to properly write an article with referenced statements about separation of powers in Hong Kong, e.g.
 * South China Morning Post (1, 2)
 * Reuters (link)
 * NHK (link)
 * The Hong Kong Legal System, Cambridge University Press
 * The Hong Kong Subconstitutional Model of Separation of Powers : The Case of Weak Judicial Review, Hong Kong Law Journal
 * The Judicial Perspective of 'Separation of Powers' in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China, Journal of International and Comparative Law
 * Currently, this article reads like a WP:POVFORK with unreferenced original research/synthesis statements like and a collection of primary documents that mention "separation of powers" in the synthesis-titled section Documents that clearly document the existence of the system of separation of powers in Hong Kong.By the way, draftification is a very standard procedure for underdeveloped new articles or articles with outstanding problems, as documented in WP:DRAFTIFY. Sorry for failing to notify you; I forgot to tick the "Notify creator" box. — MarkH21talk 03:50, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

Objection to moving
this article should not be made a draft because it documents in detail the political structure in Hong Kong, a common law jurisdiction, in the same way as the following articles do:
 * Separation of powers in Singapore
 * Separation of powers in the United Kingdom
 * Separation of powers under the United States Constitution
 * Separation of powers in Australia.

I object to this move. See Drafts.--RZuo (talk) 21:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * See my response in the section above. This article has serious issues with unreferenced original research/synthesis. This article needs substantial referencing to satisfy the Wikipedia policies of WP:V and WP:NOR. This article clearly meets criteria 1-3 of Drafts. This can be moved back if you absolutely insist, but it's already a pending AfC submission anyways. — MarkH21talk 21:39, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * So it has to be spelled out for MarkH21:
 * Other editors (including the author of the page) have a right to object to moving the page. If an editor raises an objection, move the page back to mainspace and if it is not notable list at AfD.--RZuo (talk) 21:31, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * That's literally why I said This can be moved back if you absolutely insist. You seem to continue to insist on moving this back to mainspace despite its multiple policy issues. So it will be moved but it needs massive cleanup. — MarkH21talk 22:19, 25 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The article has been moved back, the tags have been cleaned up, and the article has been expanded with content that is actually referenced to reliable sources. — MarkH21talk 00:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)